SECRETS OF FED

 

 

 

 

 

 

<meta http-equiv=”refresh” content=”0; URL=/?ref=tn_tnmn&_fb_noscript=1″ />(1) Cindy Wisner – FBI ISSUES FAKE BUNDY NEWS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT…

FBI ISSUES FAKE BUNDY NEWS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT

While the government’s case is unraveling and every government witness so far impeached at the Tier 3 Bundy Ranch trial, the FBI has issued fake news to Nevada law enforcement.

Late Thursday evening, Feb. 16, a Pahrump resident was traveling to Solid Rock Ministries’ retreat center in Ash Meadow to help with preparations for a weekend religious retreat.

On the long, dark stretch of unpaved road, the woman noticed a Nye County sheriff’s vehicle. When she stopped to inquire if there was any problems on the road that she should be aware of since she was traveling alone. the officer told her “No, it’s just a Bundy thing.” The driver replied, “What do you mean, a Bundy thing?” The officer then told her that law enforcement had been notified of a threat from Bundy protestors and were ordered to patrol all sanctuaries.

Nye Country authorities confirmed that the FBI had reported a “credible threat” and law enforcement agencies were to be on alert for Bundy protestors.
In January of 2016, FBI masquerading as hostile militia members, were exposed in Burns, Oregon by Fire Chief Chris Briels. Briels resigned over the event.

This is an utterly fake report attempting to demonize the Bundy family’s peaceful, law abiding supporters. Supporters have called for others to join their quiet, daily protest outside the federal courthouse in Las Vegas. So far only a handful show up regularly to wave flags, hold signs and hand out pocket copies of the US Constitution.

<meta http-equiv=”refresh” content=”0; URL=/epoemoceah/posts/1061941490569794?_fb_noscript=1″ />Facebook

Lavoy Finnicum Murdered on 26 Jan 2016 by the FBI and it was covered up by the government. Going to continue to spread this message. Watch this video for evidence that suggests so. Please help spread the video so that it can begin reaching people outside of our circle. If you can’t be there at the protests at least help spread the knowledge. Big thanks in Advance.

This was given to me by an Anonymous source to make public. This is why they are not letting evidence about LaVoy’s death in the Bundy trials. You can…
youtube.com

Angry

 

Like

 

Love

 

Haha

 

Wow

 

Sad

 

Angry

Comment

Kris Kris
Remove

Kris Kris https://archive.org/…/adl-fbi-conspiracy-exposed…

Full text of “adl-fbi-conspiracy-exposed-eustace-mullins”

THE ADL-FBI CONSPIRACY EXPOSED 

By Eustace Mullins - June 1979 



A spectre is haunting the halls of govern- 
ment in Washington - the spectre of J. Edgar 
Hoover. Should this man's crime against the 
citizens of our Republic become known to the 
American people, it could topple the conspira- 
tors from their throne of power. Why have 
government officials persistently but quietly 
proceeded with efforts to have the new head- 
quarters of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 
which was dedicated without ceremony as the J. 
Edgar Hoover Building, given a new name 
which does not recall the infamous director of 
the FBI? Why have government officials placed 
in dead storage some personal mementoes of J. 
Edgar Hoover which were willed to the new FBI 
building by Hoover's lifelong intimate, Clyde 
Tolson? These mementoes were to have been 
the prize exhibits in a special "J. Edgar Hoover 
Memorial Room", but officials have announced 
that there will be no J. Edgar Hoover Room in 
the building. 

Those who still believe J. Edgar 
Hoover's propaganda that he was the great 
"anti-Communist", the "American Champion 
of Law and Order", and the "Great Gangbus- 
ter" fail to realize that he spent many millions of 
taxpayers' dollars to foist his personal myth on 
the American public, and spent more millions to 
conceal from the public his real history of scan- 
dal, blackmail, extortion and conspiracy. 

J. Edgar Hoover came into prominence 
by riding the coattails of a minor government 
imbroglio which was built up as "the scandal of 
the century", the Teapot Dome scandal. He met 
his end as one more victim of a second imbroglio 
which was built up by the controlled press as the 
"crime of the century", the Watergate Break-in. 
Throughout his public life, J. Edgar Hoover was 
successful in maintaining two goals - to conceal 
his personal history from the American people, 
and to use the FBI, not as a force against crime, 
but as a private police force dedicated to the 



Page 1 

service of the most vicious criminal conspirators 
in the world, the homocidal maniacs of the 
Zionist terrorist movement 

On June 8, 1978, the Washington Post 
reported the strange case of an American citi- 
zen, Sami Esmail, who visited Israel to be at his 
dying father's bedside. As he stepped off the 
plane, he was arrested by Israeli security forces 
and taken to jail, where he endured extensive 
torture. He was kicked in the stomach, his hair 
pulled, and he was forced to stand naked for 
many hours while the tortures continued. The 
crime of which he was accused in Israel was that 
he had joined a Palestinian student group while 
he was attending Michigan State University. 
The FBI, which maintains paid informants in 
every Arab organization in the United States, 
has up-to-date files on every member of these 
organizations. Although these groups are very 
small and have no political influence in the 
United States, in 1976 the FBI spent four mil- 
lion dollars for surveillance of one hundred and 
eighteen members of these Arab student or- 
ganizations, about twice as much as it spent in 
1976 on surveillance of members of organized 
crime! 

When the American student Sami Es- 
mail purchased a plane ticket to Israel to be with 
his dying father, the FBI, through its militant 
surveillance of the Arab students, immediately 
informed the Israeli police, who were waiting 
for him when the plane landed. Although Sami 
Esmail had never committed any crime in Israel, 
and as an American citizen was not subject to 
arrest there UNTIL he had committed some 
offense, American officials refused to intervene 
on his behalf. He was arrested solely as the result 
of FBI surveillance in the United States where, 
also, he had never committed any crime and was 
not a proper subject for surveillance or intelli- 
gence information from the FBI! Sami Esmail 
was now threatened with tenyears in prison, and 
further torture, unless he became a double 
agent for the Israeli intelligence service. His 
crime: That he belonged to a "proscribed or- 
ganization", not in Israel but in the United 
States, where supposedly the Israelis have no 



Page 2 



jurisdiction. In fact, the Israeli intelligence serv- 
ice has jurisdiction over every American citizen 
throughout the United States directly through 
the FBI. To convince him of the hopelessness of 
his position, two "American" Jewish lawyers 
visited Sami Esmail in his Israeli prison. These 
lawyers, J. Monroe Freedman and Alan Der- 
showitz, then announced to the world press that 
Sami Esmail had not been tortured, and that he 
was grateful for the kind treatment he had 
received from his Israeli torturers! 

As the citizens of the United States 
cringe fear of their lives, not daring to go out 
after dark, as the criminals have taken com- 
mand of the streets, we taxpayers well might ask: 
"What is the FBI, our famed gangbuster organi- 
zation, doing to protect us from the ravages of 
the criminals?" The answer is NOTHING. 
Quite a few years ago, the FBI ceased to be a 
bureau of the government of the United States, 
because it was taken over by an alien organiza- 
tion, and became the unregistered agent of a 
foreign power, the Anti-Defamation League of 
B'nai B'rith. After this takeover, the FBI de- 
voted most of its efforts to the ADL's subterra- 
nean terrorist activities against all American 
citizens, while the forces of organized crime and 
underground Communism were left to rage 
unchecked throughout the nation. 

During the heyday of the excesses com- 
mitted by various Jews in charge of the Water- 
gate imbroglio, several members of Nixon's staff 
were charged with what seemed to be a new 
crime in the American history of jurisprudence, 
lying to an FBI agent These officials could 
never have been convicted of this charge if they 
had made the obvious defense that it is not a 
crime to "lie" or to give inaccurate information 
to an unregistered agent of a foreign power. The 
crime was that an unregistered agent of a foreign 
power, posing as an agent of the American 
government, was seeking information for the 
purposes of that foreign government from an 
American citizen. Further, it is a crime for any 
American citizen to give information to an FBI 
agent who is acting as an agent of the state of 
Israel and who is subverting the authority of the 



American government and committing crimes 
against the people of the United States. Any 
American who provides information to an FBI 
agent under these circumstances becomes an 
accessory after the fact to the operations of an 
illegal and subversive force acting on American 
soil to undermine the sovereignty of the Ameri- 
can Republic. 

Now we must ask, where was the famed 
Director of the FBI, J. Edgar Hoover, while this 
takeover was going on? The answer is that J. 
Edgar Hoover unofficially abdicated as the 
head of the FBI and let the ADL terrorists take 
over the organization which he had built up from 
nothing, because the ADL gave him no other 
choice. He must submit to have his personal 
history opened to the American public, com- 
plete with photographs, affidavits and other 
documentation, or he could continue as the 
nominal head of the FBI (with a new Assistant 
Director of the FBI, a Jew, in charge of opera- 
tions). J. Edgar Hoover chose to submit to the 
ADL blackmail, because he had used the instru- 
ment of blackmail against others too many times 
to be unaware of its devastating consequences 
should the victim refuse. From this moment, the 
FBI no longer existed, except as an arm of the 
ADL, to be used for its sinister purposes of 
undermining the American Republic and the 
sovereignty of the American people. 

In order to understand why J. Edgar 
Hoover (ostensibly the most powerful single 
official in the history of the United States, with 
a nation-wide private army at his beck and call, 
its agents answerable only to him, a power which 
no president of the United States has ever en- 
joyed) should meekly surrender this vast power 
to the most sinister aliens operating in the 
United States on behalf of a foreign power, the 
state of Israel, we must reveal here for the first 
time some details of the private life of this man, 
details which will shock and dismay many 
Americans who had beenpersuaded by J. Edgar 
Hoover's propaganda that he was a sincere 
patriot and a dedicated anti-Communist, but 
details which have been known for many years to 
politicians and journalists in Washington, D.C. 



Throughout his career, J. Edgar Hoover, 
while ruthlessly exposing weaknesses in the 
characters of those whom he wished to intimi- 
date in order to maintain his burgeoning politi- 
cal power, successfully concealed cardinal facts 
about his personal background. (These facts 
have become part of the tragic history of the 
white race and are well known and completely 
documented.) One of these was his descent from 
Harriet Hemings, a mulatto slave. Elizabeth 
Hemings, a full-blooded African, had a child by 
Captain Hemings, the master of an English 
whaler which sailed from England to Wil- 
liamsburg. Elizabeth became the slave of John 
Wales, a Welshman living in Williamsburg. 
John Wales' wife died, and Elizabeth became 
his concubine, bearing him six children, the fifth 
of which was Sally Hemings (the concubine kept 
the name of her former lover). 

While he was a member of the legislature 
meeting in Williamsburg, Thomas Jefferson 
visited the home of John Wales, where he met 
and married Martha Skelton, Wales' widowed 
daughter by his deceased wife. Martha was the 
same age as Sally Hemings, her half-sister and 
personal maid. When John Wales died Martha 
Jefferson inherited the children along with her 
father's other property. Sally Hemings later 
became the mother of Harriet (who was rather 
light-skinned in color), a forebear of J. Edgar 
Hoover. Although this heritage was not particu- 
larly noticeable in his youth, as he advanced in 
age, his mulatto origins became more and more 
pronounced - the bulging eyes, the kinky hair, 
the thick lips, and the gray skin - all of which 
advertised his African ancestry. 

John Edgar Hoover, who was bora in 
Washington, D.C., on Jan. 1, 1895, was the son of 
DickersonN. Hoover, a life-long career bureau- 
crat who became head of the Coast and Geo- 
detic Survey. As a youth, John Edgar was known 
as the smallest boy in his class at Central High 
School. He weighed only 119 pounds, the small- 
est cadet in the school corps. In later years, his 
classmates, in recalling him, used such words as 
"demure" and "petite", adjectives not usually 
employed to describe a boy. They also men- 



Page 3 

tioned that, although he was never known to 
date a girl throughout his high school career, he 
had formed a close friendship with the burly 
captain of the football team, who carried John 
Edgar's books home for him each afternoon. If 
this association caused any ribald comment 
among his peers, it remained subdued because 
of the physical strength and size of John Edgar's 
friend. 

When John Edgar graduated from Cen- 
tral High School in 1909, he immediately went 
into government service, obtaining a position as 
an indexer at the Library of Congress, at a salary 
of $30 a month. At night he studied law at 
George Washington University, receiving his 
LL.B in 1916, and his Master's degree in 1917. 
During these years, he resided at home with his 
parents, who lived well in upper-middle-class 
comfort. Despite his hours of work during the 
day and his classes in night school, he had 
developed an active social life, which remained 
secret even from his parents. He had already 
learned the method of making powerful friends 
in Washington. Although he still displayed no 
interest in the opposite sex, the demure, petite 
youth had attracted the interest of a number of 
prominent politicians who, while maintaining 
their reputations as well-established family 
men, enjoyed an occasional evening with a dis- 
creet youth...John Edgar found himself sought 
after by several men in Washington who would 
be very useful to his career in the coming years. 
The first of these strange alliances was with the 
prominent lawyer and political figure Harlan 
Fiske Stone. As soon as Hoover received his law 
degree, Stone secured a position for him in the 
then Bureau of Investigation. This bureau was 
only a fewyears old, and had but eight investiga- 
tors. It was initially established in 1908 by Attor- 
ney General Joseph Bonaparte, a nephew of the 
late Emperor of France. Within a short time, he 
had misgivings about the operations of govern- 
ment investigators in a free republic. 

On April 2, 1908, testifying before the 
hearings of the Sundry Civil Appropriations Bill 
for 1909, Joseph Bonaparte testified that there 
was a strong possiblity of "agents provocateurs" 



developing in the investigative branch of the 
Department of Justice. This was a remarkably 
prophetic statement, as within fifty years, the 
operations of the FBI consisted almost solely of 
the activities of agents provocateurs and paid 
informants. Despite Bonaparte's testimony, the 
appropriation for the investigators was ap- 
proved. His successor as Attorney General, the 
Wall Street lawyer George Wickersham of 
Wickersham and Taft, named the new investiga- 
tive branch the Bureau of Investigation. In 1935, 
J. Edgar Hoover persuaded F.D. Roosevelt to 
give this bureau greater authority, and to re- 
name it the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 
despite the fact that there were already federal 
investigators working in a number of depart- 
ments, such as the Treasury Department, Post 
Office and others. Presumably, these investiga- 
tors for other federal departments were no 
longer "federal" investigators. 

Other concerned Americans in addition 
to Bonaparte saw in the new bureau a danger to 
the liberties of the people. At the 1908 Hearings 
of the House Appropriations Committee, Con- 
gressman Walter J. Smith, Iowa, 60th Congress, 
strongly opposed the authorization for this 
branch. He declared: "No general system of 
spying upon and espionage of the people, such 
as has prevailed in Russia, in France under the 
empire, and at one time in Ireland, should be 
allowed to grow up." Congressman Smith's 
opposition immediately aroused the ire of Presi- 
dent Theodore Roosevelt, a former police 
commissioner of New York who had thrown his 
support behind the establishment of the Bureau 
of Investigation. Roosevelt claimed that detec- 
tives who were sworn to uphold the law could 
never violate it. In an effort to prevent the 
establishment of the Bureau of Investigation, 
Congress passed a bill on May 30, 1908, forbid- 
ding the Department of Justice from borrowing 
detectives from the Secret Service or any other 
agencies. 

A month after Congress had adjourned, 
the Department of Justice quietly set up the very 
agency that Congress had refused to authorize, 
calling it the Bureau of Investigation. Thus the 



Page 4 

FBI from its very inception was set up in an 
atmosphere of deceit and trickery, destined 
from its beginnings as the tool of powerful and 
unscrupulous behind-the-scenes figures, a 
number of congressmen were infuriated by the 
deception which had been practiced on them by 
the Department of Justice. However, when they 
returned from their summer adjournment, they 
could find no practical way to force the Depart- 
ment of Justice to disband its investigators. 

Congressman Shirley had also voiced his 
opposition to such a force at the Congressional 
hearings, stating: "In my reading of history I 
recall no instance where a government perished 
because of the absence of a secret service force, 
but many there are that perished as a result of 
the spy system. If Anglo-Saxon civilization 
stands for anything, it is for a government where 
the humblest citizen is safeguarded against the 
secret activities of the execution of 
government....Not in vain did our forefathers 
read the history of the Magna Carta and the Bill 
of Rights..." The Fourth Amendment declares: 
"The right of the people to be secure in their 
persons, houses, papers and effects, against 
unreasonable searches and seizures, should not 
be violated." 

Americans today should honor the 
memory of these forgotten congressmen who 
sought in vain to protect future generations 
from the depredations of agents provocateurs. 
Today, no American citizen is secure in his 
home, because he is subject at any moment to 
search and seizure by federal agents from any 
one of half-a-dozen departments. In this writer's 
researches over the past thirtyyears, one fact has 
emerged - that those American leaders who 
sought to defend the liberties of the people have 
had their names erased from the records of 
public service, while those leaders who have 
betrayed the American people into the hands of 
sinister aliens, such as Woodrow Wilson, Fran- 
klin D. Roosevelt, and their many mis-shapen 
followers, are hailed as the champions of liberty 
and the saviors of the nation. One of J. Edgar 
Hoover's first assignments with the Bureau of 
Investigation was to accompany the team of 



federal agents which attacked the home of 
Congressman Charles Lindbergh. The teamhad 
instructions to destroy all copies of Lindbergh's 
books which revealed the origins of Woodrow 
Wilson's involvement of our country in World 
War I. They were told to use "all necessary 
force" to cany out this objective, which gave 
them carte blanche to kill if resistance was 
encountered. Although young Hoover was sent 
along merely as a departmental observer, a 
safeguard against complaints because of Con- 
gressman Lindbergh's political prominence, 
when the young Charles Lindbergh rushed out 
to defend his father's property, Hoover kicked 
him in the stomach, and he was dragged away by 
two of the agents. Young Lindbergh never got 
over this youthful tragedy, while J. Edgar 
Hoover in later years avoided meeting Lind- 
bergh whenever he came to Washington. It is 
doubtful if Lindbergh ever connected Hoover 
with the team which attacked his home, but this 
may have been one reason why Hoover with- 
drew all cooperation of the FBI with the prose- 
cution of Richard Bruno Hauptmann. The most 
important reason, of course, was that Hoover 
had been informed that the Jews were manufac- 
turing a totally false and perjured chain of wit- 
nesses and testimony against Hauptmann, and 
he wished to protect his beloved Bureau from 
becoming involved in such a precipitously dan- 
gerous affair. 

The Lindbergh attack by the fledgling 
Bureau of Investigation proves, that from its 
inception, its principal function has been the 
control of political dissidents by any means, 
book-burning, the manufacture of evidence, 
and the work of agents provacateurs. Because 
Congressman Lindbergh had made his greatest 
speeches on the floor of the House inopposition 
to the establishment of the Federal Reserve 
System by the Money Trust, he was performing 
a heroic role in defending the liberties which our 
forefathers had won for us. Like all revolutions 
since the beginnings of time, the high-water 
mark of the people's freedom was the exact 
conclusion of the American Revolution. The 
freedoms they had won at such cost had begun 



Page 5 

to be eroded away as soon as the fighters laid 
down their arms. 

At the time J. Edgar Hoover began his 
career of public service, government employ- 
ment, which even then was the city's largest 
industry, was regarded with polite contempt by 
Washington's older families. To the city's mon- 
eyed class, with interests in real estate, banking 
and other businesses, government employees 
were beyond the pale. Local businessmen 
strictly adhered to a long-standing principle that 
they would never hire anyone who had been in 
government employment. Their reasoning was 
beyond question. Because the government paid 
the lowest salaries in the area, no one of ability 
would take a job there if he could obtain employ- 
ment in the higher-paying private sector. If a 
former government employee sought work in 
private business, he encountered the suspicion 
that he must be unemployable if he could not 
hold a government job. This was the local status 
of the class of government servants to which J. 
Edgar Hoover had been bred and born. Signifi- 
cantly, throughout his life he had never consid- 
ered any job in private business, although, once 
his propaganda had built himself up as an im- 
portant figure, he had a number of attractive 
offers. In fact, no private salary could have met 
the enormous expenses of his life as a pubUc 
servant, with its many fringe benefits. 

When young Hoover had completed his 
schooling, there was nothing in the area for him 
to do but go into government service. So greatly 
has the situation changed that today it is difficult 
to reconstruct the atmosphere of the Washing- 
ton in which Hoover grew up. Government 
servants are now an arrogant, well-paid bu- 
reaucracy, with higher salaries than the 
corrsponding private sector. Washington itself 
is one of the wealthiest communities in the 
United States, with a "depression-proof econ- 
omy and the highest average family incomes. 
Sixty years ago, Washington was almost a de- 
pressed area, with modest homes, very modest 
salaries, and very little social life. Crime was 
almost nonexistent. It was a sleepy southern 
town, rigidly segregated, with Negroes occupy- 



ing the bottom of the scale in housing and 
income. Certainly those who had passed for 
white would make every effort to put as much 
social distance between themselves and their 
co-racialists as possible. Today the District of 
Columbia is the largest Negro city in the world, 
with a crime rate eighteen times higher than that 
of London. This is the change which the "Great 
Gangbuster" lived through in his home town. 

In that day, it would have been unthink- 
able to cultivate a government employee for his 
influence, as he had none. The press corps 
consisted largely of a group of "stringers", jour- 
neyman reporters who filed stories whenever 
something occurred which was noteworthy 
(which was not often) and who were paid by the 
column-inch. Consequently, they lived very 
close to starvation. Washington generated very 
little news of national importance, and the 
government bureaus had no public relations 
officials. Statements about changes of policy 
would be delivered by the department heads 
themselves to two or three reporters, if any 
showed up at all. There was no mad dash to the 
telephone when these pronouncements were 
received. Instead, the reporters sauntered to the 
nearest dingy bars for several hours of serious 
drinking before they returned to their 
newsrooms. Although billions of dollars had 
swept through the city during the government's 
orgy of spending during World War I, very little 
of the money had remained there. It had all been 
seized and removed by various entrepreneurs in 
New York and other strongholds of the Zionists, 
for World War I had been the Jews' first great 
bid for power. The Washington government 
clerks continued at their usual low salaries. 

Young J. Edgar Hoover's status began to 
emerge when he was appointed Special Assis- 
tant to the Attorney General of the United 
States in 1919. At this time, the handsome young 
man was twenty-four years old and still could be 
described as "petite" and "demure". One of his 
special friends was the leonine Senator Henry 
Cabot Lodge, who was leading the opposition in 
Congress to Woodrow Wilson's attempt to 
abandon American sovereignty by involving us 



Page 6 

in the League of Nations. Learning of Lodge's 
association with young Hoover, Woodrow 
Wilson sent an emissary to him suggesting that 
this involvement should persuade Lodge to 
reverse his stand against the League of Nations, 
with the clear threat that if not, much could be 
made of the situation. This identical ploy was to 
work some years later when Senator Vanden- 
berg, leader of the congressional opposition to 
our involvement in the United Nations, was 
seduced by an attractive British Secret Service 
agent. Faced with exposure, Vandenberg as- 
tounded Washington politicians by suddenly 
announcing that he was abandoning all opposi- 
tion to the United Nations and would hence- 
forth support it. He then led the fight for confir- 
mation of our joining the United Nations. 

However, Henry Cabot Lodge was no 
Vandenberg. He informed the emissary that he 
should return to Woodrow Wilson and tell him 
that he was too deeply involved in preparing an 
edition on the Peck letters for publication to 
consider Wilson's proposal at the moment. The 
Peck letters, of course, consisted of Wilson's 
indiscreet outpourings to a lady friend. The Jews 
had already blackmailed Wilson with them by 
forcing him to appoint the radical Zionist leader 
Brandeis to the Supreme Court. Lodge's reply 
sent Wilson into deep depression and, shortly 
afterwards, he suffered a massive stroke. 

In 1948, George Stimpson, founder of 
the National Press Club, introduced me to a 
florid, paunchy man in his early sixties. His name 
meant nothing to me, and I paid little attention 
to him. The next day, Stimpson, in his wry way, 
said to me, "Just what does it take to impress 
you, anyway?" "What do you mean?" I asked. "I 
introduced you to a former President of the 
United States yesterday, and you virtually ig- 
nored him." "That man was a former President 
of the United States?" "He was indeed," said 
Stimpson. "I remember it well, as I was fairly 
new in Washington at that time. When Wilson 
had a stroke, it was feared that if word of his true 
condition got out, it would paralyze the fight to 
secure approval of the League of Nations bill. So 
that no one could see his condition, he was 



spirited out of Washington, and his daughter-in- 
law took him to the Pine Grove Inn in Asheville, 
North Carolina. They stayed there six weeks. 
During that time, the fellow to whom I intro- 
duced you was a White House aide. Word was 
given out that although Wilson could not see 
anyone, he would continue to fulfill his duties of 
office. Bills were signed and returned to Con- 
gress, statements of policy were issued by the 
White House, and it was all done by the fellow 
you met here. He and Mrs. Wilson were running 
the United States, while Wilson remained hid- 
den in Asheville, N.C., unable to speak or move. 
That story has never been told." 

I later searched through all the biogra- 
phies of Woodrow Wilson, and was never able to 
find mention of this unofficial President, who 
remained with Mrs. Wilson during the remain- 
der of Wilson's Presidency. 

J. Edgar Hoover's reputation as a great 
anti-Communist originated with his service 
under William J. Burns, Chief of the Bureau of 
Investigation until 1924, when Hoover replaced 
him. Harry Daugherty, President Harding's 
right-hand man, and Burns had led the battle 
against the Communists and had thwarted the 
take-over of the United States government by a 
Communist revolution. During this battle, on 
June 2, 1919, Atty. Gen. A. Mitchell Palmer's 
home at2132 R. St. N.W., Washington, D.C. was 
blown up. Across the street, Assistant Secretary 
of the Navy Franklin D. Roosevelt opened his 
front door to find bits of the body of one of the 
bombers on his front porch. The bombing was in 
retaliation for the famed "Palmer raids", in 
which thousands of wild-eyed Jewish Commu- 
nist revolutionaries had been rounded up and 
deported as undesirable aliens. 

The Communists now counter-attacked 
on all fronts. The demand for "civil-rights" dates 
from this period, as well as the work of the 
American Civil Liberties Union. On June 1, 
1920, a special House of representatives Com- 
mittee summoned Atty. Gen. Palmer before 
them, demanding that the "rights" of the aliens 
be protected. It was the opening gun for the 
systematic destruction of the entire Harding 



Page 7 

administration team and for the replacement of 
William J. Burns by J. Edgar Hoover at the 
Bureau of Investigation. At this time, William J. 
Burns was renowned as the world's most famous 
detective. Burn's father had been Police Com- 
missioner of Columbus, Ohio. At the age of 
twenty-four, young Burns exposed the election 
frauds of 1883. He joined the U.S. Secret Serv- 
ice, and soon uncovered a vast counterfeiting 
ring which had operated unmolested for twenty- 
five years. In New York, he solved the murder of 
gambler Herman Rosenthal and sent a police 
lieutenant and four gunmen to the electric chair. 

The drive against the Communists re- 
sulted in the labeling of the Harding administra- 
tion as the "most corrupt administration in 
history" a falsehood which persists to this day. 
One of Daugherty's aides, Jess Smith, suppos- 
edly committed suicide, and the sum of S 10,000 
was found in his room. As it was promptly 
confiscated by the government, the ancient ploy 
of planting it there was probably used. The 
discrediting of the Harding administration pro- 
ceeded in a step-by-step program which was 
remarkably duplicated in the indictment of the 
Nixon administration a few years later. The 
"scandals" of the Harding administration re- 
sulted in the jailing of Daugherty, who was 
replaced as Attorney General by John Edgar 
Hoover's longtime friend and ally, Harlan Fiske 
Stone. Stone, a notorious left-winger, immedi- 
ately fired Burns, replacing him with John Edgar 
Hoover. Furious at having been ousted after 
having wiped out the Communist menace in the 
United States, Burns sought help on Capitol 
Hill, telling friendly congressmen that Hoover 
had gotten his job "by the back door". He 
received sympathy but no active support. Under 
Stone and Hoover, the Bureau of Investigation's 
anti-Communist work came to a halt. The volu- 
minous files on Communist subversion were 
packed away, never to be seen again. Priceless 
documentation on such Communist agitators as 
Felix Frankfurter was quietly disposed of. 
However, this was but the opening gun in the 
campaign of the Communist apologists. 

A nation-wide press campaign attacked 



the Harding administration as "the most cor- 
rupt in history". The keystone of the campaign 
was the "Teapot-Dome" scandal. Like the 
Watergate scandal of a later era, it was labeled 
"the crime of the century". For the first time, my 
researches have exposed the Teapot Dome as a 
"media event", which was never a scandal at all. 
Instead, it was a convenient coverup for a much 
greater scandal, perpetrated by the very inter- 
ests which now accused the Harding administra- 
tion of corruption! In the early 1920's, a few 
patriotic congressmen had begun investigations 
into the billions of dollars stolen from the gov- 
ernment during the Wilson administration. The 
targets of this investigation were Bernard Bar- 
uch (Wilson's head of the War Industries 
Board), Eugene Meyer (head of the War Fi- 
nance Corporation, who printed millions of 
dollars of Liberty Bonds and sold them in dupli- 
cate, keeping profits from the sale of the dupli- 
cates for himself) and the Rockefellers, who 
double-billed the military services for billions of 
dollars worth of oil and other supplies. One 
interesting result of this swindle was that Eu- 
gene Meyer used his profits to buy the Allied 
Chemical Corporation and the Washington 
Post. It was the Washington Post, purchased 
with money stolen from the U.S.Government, 
which "broke" the Watergate "scandal". The 
details of the Rockefeller swindles had been 
worked out by their banker, Jacob Schiff of 
Kuhn-Loeb Co. and his Jewish cohort, Herbert 
Lehman of Lehman Brothers banking house, 
who had taken a job as procurement officer in 
Washington with the U.S. Army. At the same 
time, Senator James A. Reed was accusing 
Herbert Hoover of having squirreled away mil- 
lions of dollars in graft while acting as the head 
of another Rothschild swindle, the Commission 
for Relief in Belgium. To forestall these investi- 
gations, Baruch, Meyer, and Schiff invented the 
Teapot-Dome story, selecting as their victims 
two oilmen, Harry Sinclair and Edward L. 
Doheny, whom the Rockefellers had been 
trying either to buy out or force out of business. 

Teapot Dome was a western oil field 
which held much of the Navy's oil reserves. 



Page 8 

However, geologists found that because of the 
sandy formation, the oil was sinking into the 
ground and should be recovered soon or it 
would be lost forever. It could only be saved by 
pumping it out and storing it in tanks. Officials 
approached Harry Sinclair and Edward L. 
Doheny, proposing that they undertake the sal- 
vage operation. Sinclair, an astute oil operator, 
investigated, and found that he could make a 
profit from the operation. He and Doheny set up 
a company, the Mammoth Oil Co., which leased 
Teapot Dome from the government. The Secre- 
tary of the Interior, Albert Fall, knowing little or 
nothing about the mechanics of the operation, 
signed the lease as an ordinary part of his job. 
Little did he know that his name was to enter the 
American language as "fall guy", a "patsy who 
takes a fall" or serves a prison term for a crime 
in which he is taking the blame for someone else. 

At this very time, Fall suddenly faced a 
financial crisis. New Mexico officials, without 
prior notification, doubled the taxes on his 
ranch in the Tularosa basin. Fall, operating as 
the Tres Rios Land and Cattle Co. (jointly with 
his son-in-law Mahlon Everhart) owned the 
largest ranch in New Mexico, controlling 
750,000 acres in an area of fifty-five miles by 
twenty-four miles. Faced with the loss of his 
ranch, Fall mentioned to Harry Sinclair, who 
habitually dealt in million-dollar deals, that he 
needed a loan to pay his taxes. Sinclair promptly 
lent him $200,000 and Doheny lent him 
$100,000. The loans were fully secured by notes 
against the land. Unknowingly, these principals 
were about to be "exposed" as the "criminals of 
the century". 

The Rockefellers approached New York 
papers with the story, but not one editor would 
touch it because of the obvious libels against the 
principals. They sent one of their hangers-on, an 
oilmannamed John Leon Stackwho ran errands 
for them, to the most unsavory newspaper pub- 
lisher in the United States, Harry Bonfils of the 
Denver Post. Bonfils had been run out of Kansas 
City after operating a fake lottery there. His 
swindles were so notorious that he caused nearly 
all states in the United States to enact laws 



Page 9 



prohibiting lotteries, which laws remained in 
effect for many years. With his profits, Bonfiis 
bought the Denver Post, not because he was 
interested in journalism, but because he couid 
and did use the newspaper for extortion and 
blackmail. He would print up a front page de- 
tailing an escapade of a local "mark", and send 
the page over to the "mark", still wet from the 
press. Bonfiis would demand from ten to twenty 
thousand dollars to refrain from printing the 
story, which the "mark" usually paid. If he re- 
fused, Bonfiis had a lurid circulation-building 
story for his front page. 

Without revealing that his backers were 
the Rockefellers, Stack promised Bonfiis one 
hundred thousand dollars if he would print the 
Teapot Dome story. Bonfiis, who immediately 
saw the hand of the Rockefellers in the deal, 
demanded two hundred thousand dollars. Stack 
agreed, paying Bonfiis an advance of five thou- 
sand dollars. Bonfiis immediately headlined 
that the greedy vultures, Sinclair and Doheny, 
had "stolen" the nation's oil reserves, leaving 
the Country helpless in the face of possible 
attack. This treasonable act had been made 
possible by their bribing of Secretary Fall. Once 
the story hit the front page, other editors across 
the United States took it up, and any possible 
denials were ignored. In fact, the records of the 
subsidence of the oil were not made public until 
1944, after Fall had died! 

Whatever fee Stack had been promised 
by the Rockefellers to publicize the story, he 
refused to pay Bonfiis anything further, pocket- 
ing whatever was left after the initial five-thou- 
sand-dollar payment. Bonfiis imperiled the 
entire Teapot-Dome story by threatening to sue 
him for "breach of contract", but in some way, 
he was persuaded to remain silent, and Teapot 
Dome became history. Like the Watergate 
break-in, the story remained frontpage news for 
many months, as the government dragged out 
proceedings against the principals. The advan- 
tages of this strategy were obvious. All of the 
proposed congressional investigations of Bar- 
uch, Meyer, and the Rockefellers (and the bil- 
lions of dollars they had defrauded the United 



States government) were quietly dropped, 
never to be mentioned again, while each week 
government officials revealed new prosecutions 
planned against the "criminals" of the Teapot- 
Dome affair. 

Like the Watergate-show trials, the 
Teapot Dome prosecutions were allowed to 
dragon for many years. It was not until 1931 that 
Secretary Fall was finally sent to prison, which 
conveniently revived the entire "scandal" just in 
time for Roosevelt's successful campaignfor the 
presidency. The congressional investigations of 
the affair, also like the Watergate burglary, were 
conducted along strict party lines, with the 
Democratic leaders howling for more action 
and the Republicans fighting a desperate and 
losing retreat. A Democratic congress, led by 
Sen. Thomas J.Walsh of Montana, achieved the 
complete annihilation of a Republican admini- 
stration. Another Democratic prosecutor of the 
Teapot-Dome affair was Senator Burton 
K. Wheeler. He was extremely anxious to gener- 
ate as much storm about Teapot Dome as pos- 
sible, to cover up his own indictment in 1924 for 
having accepted a $100,000 bribe from an oil 
promoter, Gordon Campbell. Unlike Fall's loan 
from Sinclair, Wheeler's acceptance of 
$100,000 from Campbell was an out-and-out 
payment for Wheeler's influence in obtaining 
oil rights in Wyoming. Nevertheless, Sen. Walsh, 
the prosecutor of Teapot-Dome, acted as 
Wheeler's counsel and successfully defended 
him on the charge of bribery. 

The Wheeler scandal was to have a per- 
manent effect on John Edgar Hoover. The 
Bureau of Investigation had sent agents to 
Wyoming to look into the Wheeler affair, possi- 
bly from political motives. Walsh, a fierce parti- 
san, vowed revenge on both Burns and Hoover. 
He cheered when Burns was removed, but was 
no less resolved to have Hoover fired, publicly 
stating on Capitol Hill that he would not rest 
until he got that "little...." When Franklin D. 
Roosevelt was elected President, he announced 
that Sen. Walsh was to be his Attorney General. 
On his way to the capitol to be sworn in, Walsh 
boasted that his first official act would be to fire 



J. Edgar Hoover. Before he could be sworn in, 
Walsh died of a heart attack. Fate, or some more 
directly concerned agency, had intervened mi- 
raculously to save Hoover's career. Walsh's 
political friends, dismayed and perhaps suspi- 
cious of Walsh's sudden demise, pursued the 
campaign to have Hoover fired. Postmaster 
General Farley joined in the campaign to get 
Hoover not from any personal animus, but 
because he wanted the post for an old friend, Val 
O'Farrell, under the time honored spoils system 
in which Farley had been brought up. Not only 
was Farley's effort unsuccessful, but it later cost 
him the presidency of the United states. John 
Edgar Hoover, never one to forget an injury, 
persuaded Roosevelt to refuse Farley the vice- 
presidency which would have later given him the 
White House. 

As the battle raged around Hoover, his 
oldest ally, Harlan Fiske Stone, who had as- 
cended to the Supreme Court, wrote an impas- 
sioned letter to FDR on Jan.2, 1932, urging that 
he be retained as head of the Bureau of Investi- 
gation. FDR cannily postponed a decision, al- 
lowing both Hoover's friends and his enemies to 
do favors for him while they waited for his 
answer. The rash of kidnappings and bank rob- 
beries gave Roosevelt his out when he claimed 
that it was too dangerous a time to change the 
leadership of the Bureau. Not only was J. Edgar 
Hoover never allowed to forget that FDR had 
saved his job, ensuring his continued loyalty, but 
Hoover launched on a furious campaign to 
amass as much dirt on all possible political 
supporters in the future. The new Atty. Gen. 
Homer Cummings, had also urged Roosevelt to 
retain Hoover, simply because his closest friend, 
J. Bruce Kremer, national Democratic commit- 
tee-man from Montana, was a long-time enemy 
of Burton Wheeler and wanted Hoover to 
remain and possibly do further damage to 
Wheeler. 

Deeply shaken by his narrow escape, 
Hoover ever afterwards devoted at least a third 
of the Bureau's manpower and resources to 
doing favors for political friends and to re- 
searching and maintaining his famous Black 



Page 10 

Cabinet, the special files which he maintained in 
his personal office. These files contained details 
in the sexual and financial peccadilloes of every 
prominent politician in the United States. They 
became as feared for what they did not contain 
as for what they actually contained, because 
every politician had reason to fear that wiretaps 
and photographs of his most sordid moments 
reposed in the Black Cabinet. The result of this 
campaign was that J. Edgar Hoover became 
director of the Bureau for life, even though 
every President after FDR swore that he in- 
tended to get rid of J. Edgar Hoover. 

For some years, a young man named 
Clyde Tolson had been a close friend of J. Edgar 
Hoover. Tolson's background was similar to 
Hoover's, an amiable young man who was taken 
up by important political figures. He had been 
confidential secretary to Newton D. Baker, Sec- 
retary of War, and later went to night school and 
obtained a law degree. In 1928, he joined the 
Bureau of Investigation as John Edgar's per- 
sonal confidant. An associate, William Sullivan, 
later said, "But, for reasons that were never 
entirely clear, Tolson rose quickly and was soon 
working at the Director's side." 

If Sullivan had ever intended to make 
these reasons more clear, he was denied the 
opportunity when he was shot and killed during 
a mysterious hunting "accident". 

On May 18, 1934, FDR signed six special 
crime bills which greatly increased Hoover's 
power. The Bureau was renamed the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation, and given mandates to 
investigate bank robberies, kidnappings and 
other felonies. Atty. Gen. Homer Cummings 
requested J. Edgar Hoover to publicize the work 
of the Bureau, in order to give his agents greater 
public authority and acceptance. Hoover, who 
had always managed to avoid the limelight, 
suddenly found he must make a complete rever- 
sal. He somewhat reluctantly embarked on a 
public relations effort, hiring a well-known 
Washington newsman, Henry Suydam. Suydam 
proved a brilliant success, and soon magazines, 
radio and newsreels were filled with glowing 
reports of the FBI achievements, even though 



(on closer inspection) they could have been seen 
to be less impressive than they were portrayed. 

J. Edgar Hoover suddenly realized that 
to the press corps, Suydam was beginning to be 
the FBI. Suydam was let go, and his name was 
never again mentioned in the FBI building. He 
had become a non-person. Hoover now dealt 
directly with the press, making announcements 
of the arrest of crime figures, and personally 
editing all press releases to put himself in the 
most favorable light. An old friend of Sen. 
Walsh, Sen. McKellar, complained on the floor 
of the Senate that Hoover had never fired a gun 
or made an arrest. Hoover quickly set up the 
arrest of a prominent fugitive, whom the FBI 
had been following for several months, the gang 
leader Alvin Karpis. When Karpis left his room, 
FBI agents rushed up to him, seized him, and 
took his gun. J. Edgar Hoover then stepped up 
and informed Karpis that he was under arrest. In 
a typical FBI mixup, it was discovered that no 
one had any handcuffs. An agent gallantly 
whipped off his tie and secured Karpis' hands 
behind his back. The nation's press headlined 
Hoover's fearless deed, and silenced his critics 
on Capitol Hill. 

After some years, J. Edgar Hoover al- 
lowed another protege, Louis Nichols, to take 
over much of the public relations chores. Not 
only did Nichols name his son after J. Edgar 
Hoover; he also set up the J. Edgar Hoover 
Foundation. 

Nichols found a number of Jewish multi- 
millionaires who were more than willing to put 
up money for the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation. 
The principal donors were the toy tycoon, Louis 
Marx, whose son-in-law, Daniel Ellsberg, stole 
the Pentagon Papers and gave them to the New 
York Times, and the two largest whiskey ty- 
coons in America, the Bronfmans of Seagram 
Distilleries, and Lew Rosenstiehl of Schenley 
Distillers. These two Jews controlled seventy- 
five percent of retail liquor sales in America. 
They also were long-time mobsters who had sur- 
vived the mm-rarining wars of the 1920's. 

In his book, Secret File, Henry Messick 
wrote, p. 197: "Reinfeld had headed the Rein- 



Page 1 1 

feld Syndicate during the great days of the Big 
Seven, in partnership with the Bronfman broth- 
ers in Canada and Longie Zwillman, "the Al 
Capone of New Jersey". Much of the liquor 
brought to Rum Row off the East Coast was 
transported there by the Reinfeld Syndicate." 
On page 277, Messick writes: 'The Reinfeld 
Syndicate was divided into two parts; the Cana- 
dian end was headed by the four Bronfman 
brothers, Samuel, Abraham, Harry and Alien. 
They began as owners of a small hotel and ended 
as the richest men in Canada and head of Distill- 
ers-Seagram. It was the Bronfmans' duty to buy 
Canadian booze and ship it around the East 
Coast to the Rum Rows of Boston and New 
York". 

The ADL propagandist Drew Pearson, 
who was succeeded by Jack Anderson, entered 
many items in his diaries which he never saw fit 
to publish in his column. On July 18, 1949, he 
noted concerning Bill Helis, who had purchased 
the Tanforan race track from Joe Reinfeld: 
"Now I understand why Bill Helis contributed 
three thousand dollars to the J. Edgar Hoover 
Foundation. Helis was a front for Joe Rei nf eld." 

On April 10, 1950, in a speech before the 
. United Jewish Appeal in Newark, N.J., Drew 
Pearson noted that Joe Reinfeld had contrib- 
uted $110,000. Reinf eld's partner, the Jew 
Longie Zwillman, later was under investigation 
and conveniently "committed suicide" with a 
length of light cord when it was feared that he 
might talk. 

The Bronfmans and Rosenstiehl were 
heavy contributors to the ADL, which had long- 
standing Mafia ties with the Jewish banker of 
the Mafia, Meyer Lansky, and other Jewish 
gangsters who directed the supposedly "Sicil- 
ian" crime syndicate. Their contributions to the 
J. Edgar Hoover Foundation became bread cast 
upon the waters, as they were richly rewarded 
when Louis Nichols used his FBI and Capitol 
Hill connections to lobby through bills which 
saved them many millions of dollars. In 1958, 
Nichols lobbied an excise tax bill through Con- 
gress which saved Schenley $50 million in taxes. 
He sponsored the Forand Bill which extended 



the storage period for whiskey from eight to 
twenty years. Schenley stock increased 67 per- 
cent in value as soon as this bill was passed. 
Nichols retired from the FBI and acquired large 
estates in Virginia and New Jersey. 

J. Edgar Hoover and his consort Clyde 
Tolson for many years spent their winter vaca- 
tions as the guests of the Roney Plaza Hotel in 
Miami Beach, Florida. The Roney Plaza, which 
was also the Miami base of the columnist Walter 
Winchell was the national headquarters of the 
crime syndicate. Here the dons of the Mafia 
families could gather in absolute safety. Hotel 
thieves knew better than to ever set foot in the 
Roney Plaza, as they would exit in a box. This 
hotel was the show place of the Schine chain of 
hotels. Upstate farmers can still recall the days 
when J. Meyer Schine walked from farm to farm 
with a pack on his back, peddling household 
supplies to their wives. New York mobsters 
resolved that they needed a quiet place in the 
country in which they could torture and kill their 
victims without interference. They bought a 
hotel and asked J. Meyer Schine to run it for 
them. Soon Schine was the president of a nation- 
wide chain of hotels and theaters. When Robert 
F. Kennedy was assassinated, it was in the 
Ambassador Hotel, a Schine Hotel, a fact which 
his biographer (Arthur Schlesinger) found more 
than curious. 

The press showed no curiosity about 
Hoover's residence in the headquarters of the 
Mafia in Miami Beach, nor did they offer much 
comment on what became an annual ritual, 
Hoover's press conference in which he de- 
nounced the oft-repeated "myth" of a national 
crime syndicate. He dismissed all such reports as 
the inventions of a few sensation seekers and as 
complete nonsense. He continued to maintain 
this article of faith even after the Kefauver 
Hearings, which Kefauver had hoped would 
propel him into the presidency, but which had 
the opposite effect, because three-fourths of 
potential campaign funds could only be raised 
from the Mafia-ADL alliance. The Valachi 
revelations did little to convince J. Edgar 
Hoover of the existence of the Mafia, nor was he 



Page 12 

disturbed when Valachi insisted he would talk 
only if he would not be turned over to the FBI. 
Valachi knew that if the FBI got to him, the 
Mafia contract on him would promptly be car- 
ried out. He obtained residence on an Army 
base and survived for many years. 

For a number of years two special agents 
of the FBI actually carried out many Mafia 
"hits" on contract from the leaders of organized 
crime. When Ian Fleming was stationed in 
Washington, he was told of the existence of 
these two "specialists" who were "licensed to 
kill". He was inspired to write his famous .007 
series, even though the British never had such an 
agent as James Bond, who was based solely on 
the FBI models. 

Not only did the leaders of organized 
crime lead a charmed existence during themany 
years that J. Edgar Hoover headed the FBI; his 
agents' actual ventures into gun battles with 
criminals were often ludicrous or disastrous. 
State and local police were dismayed when 
these "Keystone cops" stumbled into carefully 
planned forays against gangsters and com- 
pletely wrecked the setups designed to entrap 
them. On Dec. 15, 1936, one of the wildest gun 
battles in the history of New York took place, 
when FBI agents attacked the hiding place of a 
notorious bank robber, Henry Brinetta. Local 
police had Brinetta staked out and were waiting 
for his partner, Merle Vandenbush, to appear, 
when the FBI (directed from a safe place in the 
rear by J. Edgar Hoover) launched a frontal 
attack on Brinetta's hiding place. The ensuing 
fusillade was described by one reporter as 
reminiscent of the Battle of the Marne. Build- 
ings caught fire from the hail of bullets, and 
firemen tried to put out the flames while dodg- 
ing bullets from both sides. New York Police 
Commissioner Lewis Valentine publicly de- 
nounced Hoover and the FBI agents for need- 
lessly endangering the lives of hundreds of citi- 
zens. Undaunted, Hoover retired to his table at 
a night club to regale Walter Winchell and other 
hangers-on with his story of the battle. Local 
police later captured Merle Vandenbush in 
Armonk, N. Y., without a shot having been fired. 



Page 13 



Because of such exploits, FBI agents had 
long encountered considerable hostility from 
state and local police officials. To counteract 
this hostility, J. Edgar Hoover set up a National 
Police School as an adjunct to his FBI Academy 
at Quantico Marine Base in Virginia. The osten- 
sible purpose was to train police in the latest 
crime-fighting methods perfected by the FBI. In 
fact, the ADL took over the entire program of 
the police academy and used it to "politicize" 
the police departments throughout the United 
States. Crime problems were ignored as the 
academy curriculum, prepared by the ADL, fo- 
cused on "minority rights" and the treatment of 
the "disadvantaged". Those police who adopted 
the ADL propaganda techniques were rapidly 
promoted, while those who resisted this Jewish 
indoctrination soon found all doors closed to 
them. The direct result of the FBI- ADL training 
has been the death of more than one thousand 
policemen at the hands of black thugs, the most 
recent case being a 16-year-old black youth who 
was brought to a station in a Washington, D.C. 
suburb for routine questioning. He seized a 
revolver from a policeman's holster and shot 
down two policemen in cold blood. He was 
convicted of manslaughter and is expected to 
serve about nine months in a "juvenile facility" 
where he will be a hero because he got two 
"honkies". 

One of the techniques developed by the 
ADL and used at the police academy requires a 
white policeman to stand rigidly at attention 
while blacks shout every possible obscenity into 
his face and then spit directly on him. Policemen 
who resent this treatment are weeded out as 
being "racially biased". The ADL also instituted 
Civilian Review Boards to harass white police- 
men who arrested black criminals. The result of 
the ADL-FBI campaign has been a national 
breakdown of the enforcement of law and order. 
The American people are terrorized by thugs; 
elderly white people starve to death in their 
apartments because they dare not go out into the 
street to buy food. Some of them commit suicide 
because they can no longer face the horror of 
their daily existence, in which gangs of black 



thugs stalk the streets, maiming and killing for 
profit, or (equally often) for pure savage pleas- 
ure in beating an elderly white person to death. 
In the name of "minority rights", policemen 
follow the training they received at the FBI 
Academy, and look the other way. 

The chief publicist for the Mafia-ADL- 
FBI alliance was a ratty New York Jew named 
Walter Winchell. FBI agents learned that they 
should read Winchell's column every day, not 
only for the routine laudatory references to 
"The Director", but also to get the list of the 
day's enemies. During World War II, Winchell 
demanded a commission as an officer in the U.S. 
Navy. He held court each night at the Stork Club 
in his lieutenant-commander's uniform while 
American boys were dying in trenches fighting 
the enemies of the Jews. J. Edgar Hoover and 
Tolson were often guest at Winchell's table, 
along with Frank Costello and other leaders of 
organized crime. In answer to widespread pub- 
lic protest over Winchell's antics as a "combat 
hero", Cong. John Rankin was asked on the 
floor of Congress, "Just who is this Walter 
Winchell, anyway?" "Oh, he's just a dirty little 
kike," responded Rankin. Congressman Dick- 
stein of New York, who had wangled Winchell's 
naval commission at the personal request of the 
ADL, jumped up to protest Rankin's remark, 
but became so excited that he dropped dead. 
Dickstein was the Jew who set up the original 
House Committee on Un-American Activities 
to harass anti-Communists. It was then taken 
over by the Texan, Cong. Maury Maverick, to 
expose the Communists. The ADL at that time 
began a frantic campaign to abolish the House 
Committee on Un-American Activities, and 
succeeded after thirty-years' struggle. 

During the years before Pearl Harbor, 
when the Jews were frantically maneuvering the 
American people into their war to save Commu- 
nism from the German armies, the ADL forced 
J. Edgar Hoover to place the entire FBI at their 
disposal to harass patriots and to end all resis- 
tance to our entering the war. They soon per- 
fected their techniques of ADL-provocateurs 
which they have used ever since, and which 



Page 14 



follow an unvarying pattern. An extremely en- 
thusiastic person joins a patriotic group, imme- 
diately begins to contribute money, organizes 
meetings and entertainments, and soon begins 
to criticize the members for not taking "more 
direct action". The provocateur proposes dyna- 
miting buildings, killing prominent Jews and 
politicians, and other actions, and brings in 
supplies of guns and dynamite, which in every 
instance is provided by the FBI. 

A typical operation concerned The 
Christian Front Sporting Club in Brooklyn. On 
Jan. 15, 1940, the FBI arrested seventeen mem- 
bers of this group and charged them with plot- 
ting to overthrow the government. The New 
York World Telegram observed: 

"Although the men were taken to court 
in handcuffs, guarded with care by deputy mar- 
shals and G-Men, they looked anything but 
dangerous. They were a shame-faced lot of low- 
paid white-collar workers and laborers." 

The trial soon brought out the fact that 
the only plot was the one set up by the FBI, which 
paid a professional informer, Denis Healey, and 
his wife $1,300 to infiltrate the sporting club. 
Healy obtained guns for the club from a Na- 
tional-Guard armory, with FBI assistance, and 
wined and dined the club members with FBI 
funds. When the members were drunk, Healy 
opened the doors of the club, and FBI agents 
with drawn guns rushed in and arrested the 
"conspirators". The outraged jury promptly 
acquitted the Christian Front members of all 
charges. 

During the 1950's, the FBI became the 
chief financial backer of the Communist Party 
of America. At one point, it was estimated that 
75 percent of all Communist Party donations 
came from informers, who comprised 18 per- 
cent of the active employees. 

J. Edgar Hoover, who had been ap- 
pointed Director to paralyze anti-Communist 
activity in the United States by his mentor, the 
left-wing Harlan Fiske Stone, systematically 
thwarted efforts to combat Communist subver- 
sion. He ignored dozens of reports that Alger 
Hiss, FDR's personal assistant, was a Commu- 



nist courier. When Elizabeth Bentley tried to 
expose a ring of communist agents, she had to 
visit FBI offices in New York and Connecticut 
for more than three months before she could get 
anyone to listen to her. In almost every trial of a 
Communist agent, the FBI surveillance had 
been conducted in such a way that the judge was 
forced to throw out the indictment because of 
wiretaps or illegal searches. 

J. Edgar Hoover made public appeals 
that anyone having knowledge of Communist 
subversion should do absolutely nothing except 
notify an FBI office. The result was that citizens 
who reported instances of Communist espio- 
nage were committed to insane asylums as 
"deluded overwrought paranoid cases with 
obsessions of persecution". Many patriots 
(myself included) were systematically hounded 
from their jobs and homes, their families were 
harassed over a period of years, their telephones 
were tapped, their mail was seized, and their 
neighbors were turned against them. 

The nation now began to suffer an epi- 
demic of bombings and killings which were the 
work of paid FBI provocateurs. In 1970, the FBI 
paid two informers $38,500 to set up an assassi- 
nation in Meridian, Miss., in which a woman was 
killed. Thousands of hippies went on the FBI 
payrolls across the nation to set up other bomb- 
ings, riots and killings. The famed Kent State 
massacre litigations which were blamed on the 
National Guard, were dismissed in court be- 
cause the fatal shots had been fired by an FBI 
provocateur. 

Although each president after FDR 
swore to get rid of J. Edgar Hoover, not one of 
them succeeded. Harry Truman had his friend 
Max Lowenthal write a book attacking Hoover 
and the FBI, the first such work ever printed in 
this country, but later he had to call on Hoover 
for assistance in protecting his homosexual as- 
sistant, David Niles, a drunken Jewish Commu- 
nist who wandered the streets picking up truck 
drivers. When they threatened to beat him up, 
the FBI agents who crouched behind garbage 
cans while Niles was cruising, would rush forth 
and rescue him. 



Page 15 



There were repeated charges of a 
"Homintern", an international homosexual and 
pro-Communist network of officials in Wash- 
ington and other countries. After swimming 
nude with President Lyndon Johnson in the 
White House pool, his intimate assistant, Wal- 
ter Jenkins, would wander over to the basement 
restroom of the nearby YMCA in search of 
further entertainment. He was arrested there in 
January 1959, but a second arrest (on Oct.7, 
1964) by vice-squad detectives exposed his 
White House connection. He was rushed to a 
hospital, suffering from "fatigue". J. Edgar 
Hoover sent him flowers and despatched a 
horde of FBI agents into the streets to counter- 
act the publicity. They conducted more than five 
hundred interviews in a vain attempt to cover up 
the case. J. Edgar Hoover made it a nightly 
practice to call Lyndon Johnson and regale him 
with the latest information on the sexual pecca- 
dilloes of his enemies on Capitol Hill. Johnson's 
presidency was a welcome change from the 
abuse which J. Edgar Hoover had to take from 
Atty. Gen. Robert F. Kennedy, who liked to 
stroll into Hoover's private office, unannounced 
(in shirt sleeves and leading a huge vicious dog) 
while he announced to no one in particular, "I 
hate queers". Clyde Tolson was heard to ex- 
claim, after one such visit, "I hope someone 
shoots and kills the son of a b...". Robert F. 
Kennedy had been the first Attorney General to 
summon J. Edgar Hoover to his office, instead of 
making the pilgrimage to the venerable 
Director's sanctum. He also demanded that 
Hoover immediately hire a large number of 
black agents. Hoover, like many who are passing 
as white, made no secret of his long-standing 
dislike of Negroes. One can envision the glee 
with which J. Edgar Hoover learned of the ap- 
proaching affair in Dallas, plans which he care- 
fully withheld from the hated brother of the 
victim. As soon as the good news was flashed 
from Dallas, J. Edgar Hoover picked up the 
phone and called Robert F. Kennedy at his 
McLean home. "Your brother's been killed," he 
said, and hung up. A few minutes later, the 
phone which Robert F. Kennedy had demanded 



he install on his desk for personal communica- 
tions began to ring. J. Edgar Hoover let it ring for 
a few minutes, and then turned to Clyde Tolson. 

"I think it's time we put this damned 
thing back out on Helen Gandy's desk where it 
belongs," he said. He later boasted that he never 
spoke to Robert F. Kennedy again during the six 
months that Kennedy stayed on as Attorney 
General. Having obtained his job as a result of 
the Teapot-Dome scandal, he now found him- 
self in a predicament as a result of the Watergate 
affair. He had learned that the money for the 
Watergate break-in, which had been laundered 
through Mexico, had come from Dwayne An- 
dreas. The interesting thing about this discovery 
was that Andreas had been a principal financial 
backer of Hubert Humphrey's campaign for the 
presidency, and had contributed many thou- 
sands of dollars to Humphrey to pay for his 
children's education. It was unlikely that he 
would have paid for the Watergate break-in 
unless it was to provide a possible excuse for 
Nixon's impeachment if Humphrey should lose 
the election. 

J. Edgar Hoover faced a dilemma. 
Should he let Nixon know about this discovery, 
which would save Nixon from impeachment; or 
should he let matters take their course? He now 
made the mistake of consulting his aides during 
his indecision. The conspirators were immedi- 
ately informed of Hoover's findings. The entire 
plot to thwart the expressed will of the American 
electorate was imperiled. Hoover must be dis- 
posed of at once. That evening, as he entered his 
bullet-proof limousine, he was immediately 
strangled. He was driven to his home and the 
body was dumped by his bedside, where it was 
discovered at 8:30 a.m. on May 2, 1972, by his 
maid, Annie Fields. Another little item we will 
never be able to prove. An era had ended. 



archive.org

<meta http-equiv=”refresh” content=”0; URL=/?_fb_noscript=1″ />

 

(3) United Patriots to Restore Our American Republic (UPROAR)

Fellow Patriots, this is the mst important issue facing Our Country. The Patriot Act has lead to an all out assault on our Civil Rights. Former FBI Chief Ted Lol Gunderson warned us about Organized Government Harassment prior to his murder by the Government. He was a True American Hero. Gangtalking is not only Unconstitutional, it’s 100% Illegal.

<meta http-equiv=”refresh” content=”0; URL=/groups/1547177628890559/?_fb_noscript=1″ />

 

(3) Facebook

The truth about the “explosives”. Nobody brought them. They were already at the refuge. Now why would Fish and Wildlife employees need explosives? As we have so adequately learned, this area of land is so sacred and explosives would most definitely destroy this sacred artifact site. Anybody can testify whatever they want to get a better plea deal or a bigger informant paycheck now but this powerful evidence took place DURING the peaceful protest before anyone knew the devastating outcome. What kind of American would destroy good people’s lives for a paycheck? And what kind of government would hire these people to purposely try to destroy good American life and families? The guilt and shame for being involved in such corruption caused my uncle’s hired informant, Ted Gardiner, to take his own life after my uncle passed away before trial. No amount of money would be worth the guilt for life.

Ammon Bundy on the phone with the FBI negotiator at the FBI complex. I know crazy right? You’re asking yourself…wait a minute…Ammon went to the FBI complex? Why didn’t they just arrest him there? Why did they need to set up an ambush to kill days later? Good question. And why would the FBI negotiator not negotiate with Ammon? Because they wouldn’t do it if cameras and recordings were around. Why? For this exact reason. It’s too hard to cover up all your lies when there is video evidence.

FBI: “So what kind of projects have you been working on at the refuge?”

Ammon: “there was some fire hazards actually in the fire house. Believe it or not. One of the guys out there was a fire inspector for most of his career so we have identified those things and we are getting some of those things cleaned up and getting some of the EXPLOSIVES cleaned up and out of the way. And we promise you, we will not use them.”

Amanda Rodgers

See More

BREAKING: The FBI Just GAVE CROOKED HILLARY HORRIBLE NEWS! –


http://viralliberty.com/wp-content/themes/mh-magazine/js/css3-mediaqueries.js

BREAKING: The FBI Just GAVE CROOKED HILLARY HORRIBLE NEWS!

Sponsored by Revcontent

This 1 Simple Trick “Fixes” Your Erectile Dysfunction (Do This Once Daily)

x

4-Time Lotto Winner Reveals One Thing He Does Every Time!

x

Baltimore Firm Has Scary Record of Predicting World Events

x

Quantcast

VIA| Hillary Clinton and her presidential campaign team are bracing for the release of the official notes from the Federal Bureau of Investigations’ (FBI) interview of Hillary regarding the illegal use of a personal email server.

Media outlets are reporting that the FBI will release these notes to Congress as early as today. While there is not a complete transcript of Hillary Clinton’s under-oath testimony, Hillary Clinton spoke to FBI agents for more than 3 hours about her use of an email server which was used to illegally transmit classified documents.


This will give Republicans new ammunition to use against Hillary Clinton, as she continues to coverup the truth about the corruption that took place during her term as President Obama’s Secretary of State. This is the worst news Hillary Clinton could hear this week:

The matter has been progressing since early July, when a formal request was made by Congress for the file — the remaining block appears to rest within the Justice Department.

The FBI, after interviewing Clinton last month, concluded its investigation of Clinton’s use of a private server, confirming publicly that 113 classified emails were sent and received by Clinton, as well as 2,000 that were classified after the fact.

FBI Director James Comey said investigators found at least three emails that contained classified markings, adding that the Democratic presidential nominee was “extremely careless.” However, he did not recommend criminal charges, and the Justice Department closed the case.

While Clinton has insisted nothing was marked classified at the time, the investigation found otherwise, with the emails containing a portion marking (C for confidential, the lowest level of classification). Fox News first reported that some of the emails were marked classified in June.


The House Oversight Committee questioned Comey for over five hours in July after he said no reasonable prosecutor would pursue criminal charges. Via Fox News

The Obama administration actively debated the release of these notes, as they contain politically sensitive materials. But the pressure by House Republicans was too great, and now voters will learn what Hillary Clinton really said to lie her way out of criminal prosecution.

Sponsored by Revcontent

From the Web

4-Time Lotto Winner Reveals One Thing He Does Every Time!

x

Pictures That Hillary Clinton Wishes Would Go Away!

x

Brutal: What Trump Just Released on Obama is Going Viral

x

This 1 Simple Trick “Fixes” Your Erectile Dysfunction (Do This Once Daily)

x

100% Success Rate Tinnitus Treatment Leaves Doctors Speechless (Try It Today)

x

Anxiety? Cannabis Extract, Now Legal in MS

x

Method Discovered By Accident “Destroys” Nail Fungus For Good

x

You Won’t Believe These 19 Creepy Family Photos

x

Watch Them Bounce In Slow Motion

x

Quantcast

Sponsored by Revcontent

Trending Today

4-Time Lotto Winner Reveals One Thing He Does Every Time!

x

Obama Can’t Escape From This Incriminating Video… Will He Be Forced To Resign?

x

Pictures That Hillary Clinton Wishes Would Go Away!

x

The NR Experiment – This Woman Is Over 50 [Watch]

x

You Won’t Believe These 19 Creepy Family Photos

x

The Science of Seduction: Study Reveals the Perfect Pickup Line

x

Leaked! Will Obama Even Finish Out His Term? Experts Say “No Way”

x

Diabetes Breakthrough That Will Bankrupt Diabetes Industry

x

Are You A Strategic Thinker? Test Your Skills With Millions Of Addicted Players!

x

25 Best Of The Worst Of Walmart!

x

Baltimore Firm Has Scary Record of Predicting World Events

x

(1) Odd Diabetes Trick “Kills” Diabetes Industry (Do This Tonight)!

x

Quantcast

15 Comments on BREAKING: The FBI Just GAVE CROOKED HILLARY HORRIBLE NEWS!

    1. Congress had a conservative majority for a long time now! Obama has been running wild! WHY hasn’t he been Impeached? these RINO’s are not going after Hillary. we will have to wait till Trump and the new congress takes over. I expect Obama to DEclare Martial Law! There’s no telling where it will go from there. If He comes after our guns, He will start a revelution.

    1. What BULL SHIT! If a member of the Armed Forces did that they would be in Prison!. 2000 + classified documents, can’t even believe that she isn’t in Ball and chains!

      What a pair! Her husband has sex in the White House hallway and she mishandles secrets, as Sec. of State!

    1. As much as I would like to see her prosecuted, she won’t be. She has way to much damaging evidence against her prosecutors, evidently. Seems to me that every one is trying to stay off the Clinton hit list!

Breaking: Fiore Reveals Bombshell in Bundy Case (Video) – Redoubt News

Breaking: Fiore Reveals Bombshell in Bundy Case

Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore dropped a bombshell today in the Bundy case.

Citing personal anonymous sources, Fiore confirmed that the Federal government has no actual case against rancher Cliven Bundy, or any of the other defendants in the 2014 Bunkerville standoff case.

A lead FBI agent working with the prosecutor in the Bundy case revealed information about the case on Friday, July 29, 2016. It was revealed that the FBI does not actually have any evidence against the Bundy’s or their co-defendants.

The main reason that the judge has sealed the evidence is because there is none!

The only evidence in this case is from Facebook. There is no actual evidence of a crime being committed in Nevada.

The plan is to delay the trial for as long as possible so that the defendant’s spirit gets broken. The FBI is counting on these regular people needing to be home to take care of their families.

Being incarcerated for over six months is taking it’s toll on the cowboys and their families. Their parents, spouses and children are having to deal with the effects of not having the major breadwinner in the home. Some of them are said to be homeless.

It has been revealed that Joseph O’Shaughnessy was threatened with never seeing his 80 year old mother alive again.

Is it any wonder that these good Patriots are settling for making deals and plea bargains. The actions of the FBI are coercing the patriots to flip on the Bundy’s, as well as make up stories in order to straighten out their home situations.

Theses tactics make people believe they are in trouble, and could spend over 100 years in prison, when they haven’t done anything to warrant this, at all.

“However, when you have an authoritarian agent terrorizing you, and trained to do so,” Fiore explains, “one can become traumatized and cooperate believing that is the only way out.”

These American citizens are being held hostage in jail with no actual evidence. They are just hoping to break them into submission. They have sealed evidence from the press and the American people. They are frightening innocent men into taking plea bargains.

This is the country we have become. These tactics are against the very fabric of our law. Would you be able to handle this if one of your family members were locked up under these circumstances?

This must stop! The government is out of control and running as if they are above the law!

View Video Here

The Americans Are Coming!

Folks the main Event page is here:
https://www.facebook.com/events/955603707887759/

JUN4

Sat 12:30 PM · Wichita Falls, TX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<meta http-equiv=”refresh” content=”0; URL=/?_fb_noscript=1″ />(18) Jeffrey Wilson<meta http-equiv=”X-Frame-Options” content=”DENY” />

HAVE THE FEDS BEEN LYING ABOUT OWNING THE LAND AT THE MALHEUR REFUGE? THE PEOPLE “OTLEY TO KNOW”
HAVE THE FEDS BEEN LYING ABOUT OWNING THE LAND AT THE MALHEUR REFUGE????? We have created this article in order to share the information given to us by those who have done some research into the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. OTLEY case from the early 1940’s. The Malheur land has been in the crosshairs of controversy in so many stories and cases that one may want to do some research and thinking about any and all “stories” spewed from the mouths of ABC agencies/agents. It is seeming to us that the majority of words in declarations of land ownership are anything but the truth fed to the Americans today. Read this and think, read the links and uncover what stinks!

“Oh, did we say WE owned the land? Sorry about that, we meant, “WE ARE STEALING YOUR LAND” says the BLM to the ranchers.
This is information from Dr Angus McIntosh. Thank you to a follower, Charmaign Edwards, for sharing this with us. DID THIS CASE SET TRUTH IN STONE THAT THE LAND WAS THE RANCHERS AND NOT FEDERAL? An example of prior existing rights is the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. In 1908 President Roosevelt, established by presidential proclamation a Bird Reserve (subject to prior existing rights). Thirty four years later the Ninth Circuit Court ruled in United States v. Otley, 127 F2d 988 (1942), that not only did the prior existing ranchers living adjacent to Malheur Lake have the absolute right to graze and cut hay within the reserve, but actually owned half of Malheur Lake itself. In 1942 the government paid for the right to construct roads, phone lines, plant trees, build fire towers, and build water control dams and structures. For the next thirty years these ranchers continued to graze cattle and cut hay. This all changed with a change in management at the Reserve/Refuge in the 1970’s. I’m curious as to exactly what was in the original 1942 purchase agreements. What rights were reserved in those agreements? Why is this new generation of Feds trying to force out the Hammonds by ignoring 18 USC 1857 that exempts “allotment owners” from the criminal arson provisions? The biggest question I have is why do the people of Harney County believe anything the Federal employees tell them when there is a proven history of them lying to ranchers about prior existing rights (U.S. v Otley, 1942)?
“Did I mention to you folks interested in the Malheur Refuge Protest and subsequent Government assault, that in 1942 the Ninth Circuit ruled that most of the land withdrawn by President Teddy in 1908 and at least half of Malheur Lake did not belong to the US in the first place? The Court said it belonged to the prior established ranchers. The government had to condemn and buy the rancher’s out under a 1933 conservation law, that only allowed for the construction of “projects”. In that case it was 95 miles of roads, the construction of fire-lookouts, the planting of trees, and the building of certain water control structures. Under that act the ranchers still owned the improvements, grazing and hay/forage rights. There is a genuine question of fact as to whether or not the land upon which the so-called “occupied federal buildings” stand actually belongs to the government. Its my understanding the so-called “occupied buildings” were actually one of the old ranch headquarters. If that is the case the property still belongs to the original ranchers heirs (since the US cannot acquire property by adverse possession). The 1942 case is United States v Otley. Very interesting reading and available on the Justia website.
HE FURTHER COMMENTS: Here are further comments offered by Dr. Angus McIntosh.
“Actually they kept on ranching and grazing for over 30 years after that 1942 decision. It wasn’t until about the time that Congress passed FLPMA that the Refuge managers started flooding out the ranchers. The original ranchers were all gone by then and the new ones simply assumed the Feds were acting lawfully.”
MORE THOUGHTS BY DR. ANGUS MACINTOSH
AGRICULTURE April 11, 2016
From Preference Rights to Grazing Allotments: Why Ranchers Own their Allotments By Angus McIntosh PhD Director Natural Resource Law & Policy Research Land And Water USA Foundation There are a lot of US Supreme Court decisions on the subject of “pioneer rights”, or settlers’ rights of “possession” or “occupancy” and “use”. The case that specifically refers to “pioneer rights” is Lamb v Davenport, 85 US 307 (1873). Arguello v United States, 59 US 539 (1855), refers to a “cattle range” held in possession for 50 years (from prior to the Mexican cession to the US) as sufficient evidence of ownership. Essentially, pioneer rights are equivalent to “possessory” or “occupancy” rights that typically have the sanction of State or Territorial legislation, or; local laws, customs and decisions of the courts; or “aboriginal” title” or “possessory” or “occupancy” rights dating from a time prior to US acquisition through “treaty” (ie. Gudalupe-Hidalgo, 1848, or the Oregon-Northwest Treaty with Great Britain, 1846). This same possessory or occupancy right of “actual settlers” gives the settler a “color of title” which has been referred to as the “preference” right. The preference is the preferred right to acquire the government’s “legal title” when the land occupied or in the possession and use of the pioneer is eventually opened to settlement. (See Frisbie v Whitney, 76 US 187 (1869)). This pioneer right of possession and preference gives the occupant the right to sell his improvements as well as his possessory title, and such ownership will “relate back” to the first pioneer’s date of settlement. This is important when you talk about establishing senior water rights and “land use rights” that predate later wildlife, fish, or environmental statutes. The Supreme Court has held that this pioneer/possessory right or title is good against all the world, accept the United States as the actual legal title owner. However, once the United States Congress by positive legislation recognizes, confirms, or sanctions a “use”, or grants a right or title, then it is no longer a mere preference or possession. Once recognized or granted to a settler by an Act of Congress, that right could not be defeated by an employee of the Executive Branch (i.e. Interior or Agriculture) who failed to perform their duty to survey and record the settler’s claim, (Shaw v Kellogg, 170 US 312 (1898).
Regarding stock raising by bona fide settlers on “public lands” prior to passage of the Grazing Act of March 3, 1875 (18 Stat 481), stock grazing was merely at the sufferance or tacit consent of Congress under a color of title based on State/Territorial “range” laws. While this “possessory/ preference” right was good against all others, it was not good against the United States as legal title owner until validated by, or properly initiated under, an Act of Congress (Frisbie v Whitney, 76 US 187 (1869) and The Yosemite Valley Case, 82 US 77 (1872)). However, after passage of the Grazing Act of 1875, Congress validated the right of settlers to “graze” cattle, horses and other stock animals (even to the point of “destroying grass and trees”), on any land open to settlement under the homestead, preemption, or mineral land laws. Of course this was often necessary in order to improve pasture or plant crops. By the Act of July 26, 1866 (14 Stat 2530) Congress had already recognized, sanctioned and confirmed ranch settler’s stockwater rights and stocktrail (“highway”) right-of-ways. Therefore, when land in the actual possession of a bona fide settler as a “range” was later incorporated into a federal military reservation, the ranch settler not only owned stockwater rights and stocktrail ROWs, but, had the “preference” right over all others to be “granted the privilege” to continue “grazing cattle, horses, sheep and other stock animals” (Act of 1884, 23 Stat 103).
Additionally, when the reservation was no longer needed for military purposes, any actual settler (if still in possession) had the preference right to acquire title through the homestead laws or by purchase (Act of 1884, supra).
A short list of key decisions pertaining to this principle of “preference/possessory rights” related to “range” rights would be:
Arguello v US, 59 US 539 (1855) 50 yrs possession of cattle range under color of title gives title good against the United States government. Frisbie v Whitney, 76 US 187 (1869) Possession and improvement gives a settler a preference right to acquire title, which right land department officers are bound to protect. Lamb v Davenport, 85 US 307 (1872) Possessory rights and improvements could be sold even before any act of congress was passed allowing for disposal of that land. Atherton v Fowler, 96 US 513 (1877) Possession of an enclosed range and improvement of the forage was sufficient to establish possession and defeat later homestead claimants even if the enclosed land far exceeded the amount allowed under the homestead laws. The first settler was entitled to compensation as owner of the forage cut and removed by a second fraudulent claimant even if the legal title to the underlying land was still in the US. Hosmer v Wallace, 97 US 575 (1879) Where a settler was in possession or occupancy of thousands of acres as a stock ranch the land was segregated from appropriation by later settlers. Griffith v Godey,113 US 89 (1885) A settler in possession of thousands of acres of a cattle range, controlled by his ownership of water rights in key springs and of a homestead was the owner of a property right in the range. Wilson v. Everett, 139 U.S. 616 (1891) An expansive cattle range on the Republican river and its tributaries covering portions of Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas was a possessory private property interest subject to recovery of damages. Cameron v United States, 148 US 301 (1893), Possession and improvement of thousands of acres as a cattle range gave color of title or a claim that removed the land from the class of “public lands” and therefore the enclosure of such was not a violation of the Unlawful Occupancy act of 1885. Lonergan v. Buford, 148 US 581 (1893), An expansive cattle range together with all water rights, fences and improvements thereon covering portions of Utah and Idaho was possessory private property capable of sale and subject to contract enforcement. Swan Land and Cattle Co. v Frank, 148 US 603 (1893), A large cattle range in Wyoming together with water rights, and improvements were possessory property rights subject to actions at law for recovery. Catholic Bishop v Gibbon, 158 US 155 (1895) By treaty possessory rights of settlers in British Oregon shall be respected; Grayson v Lynch, 163 US 468 (1896) A cattle range suitable for pasturage, watering, and raising cattle in New Mexico was a property right such that the owner could recover for damages caused by diseased cattle being driven across his range. Tarpey v Madsen, 178 US 215 (1900) Possession implies improvement and settlement with intent to acquire title when land is opened for disposal, but cabins, corrals improvements for hunting, trapping, etc also allowed Ward v Sherman, 192 U.S.168 (1904) A large cattle range, cattle then on the range, and the desert wells were all private property subject to sale and mortgage. Bacon v Walker, 204 US 311 & Bown v Walling, 204 US 320 (1907) Idaho range laws recognizing settler’s right to exclusively graze lands within two miles of their homestead did not infringe on United States’ underlying title. St Paul M&M R Co v Donohue, 210 US 21 (1908) All public lands were opened to settlement and entry after 1880 and a settlers’ improvements were sufficient notice of his claim to defeat later claimants. Northern Pacific R Co v Trodick, 221 US 208 (1911) Until a local land office was established and a survey conducted the rights of settlers in possession of public lands could not be defeated by either subsequent withdrawal or grants to third parties. Curtin v Benson, 222 US 78 (1911) Where a settler owned seven scattered parcels of land connected with 1866 Act right-of-ways, intermingled with 23,000 acres of range rights, before the United States included that land into a national park, the possessory range owner did not afterwards have to acquire a permit prior to using his property rights.
Under the Forest Reserve/Homestead Acts of 1891/1897 (26 Stat 1102/30 Stat 33) all land withdrawn as Forest Reserves that was occupied by “actual settlers” (possessory range rights), and was valuable for “agriculture” (stock raising), not only had “preference” rights attached to them, but also had a network of easements, water rights, Right Of Ways, and improvements that belonged to the bona fide settlers (Act of July 26, 1866 (14 Stat 253), Livestock Reservoir Site Act, 0f 1897 (29 Stat 484), and cases cited above). The Act of 1880 had opened all the land in the West to settlement, and had recognized settlers’ improvements and possession were sufficient to put any later claimants on notice that the land was already occupied (Cox v Hart, 260 US 427 (1922). The free homestead Act of 1900, (31 Stat. 179), opened all agricultural public lands acquired by treaty to settlement and entry free of charge (except for filing fees).
In1902 Congress enacted the Reclamation Act (32 Stat 388), which altered the policy of granting specific acreage amounts of Desert Land (i.e.160, 320, 640, etc.) and adopted the “Unit policy” which instead granted to a homestead entryman an “amount of land sufficient for the support of a family”. The same policy was followed when Congress enacted the Forest Homestead Act of June 11,1906 (34 Stat. 233, 35 Stat. 554) which included a “preference” right for actual settlers to enter any number of 160 acre tracts up to the amount of their actual settlement. In1910, Congress authorized the granting of “allotments” to Indians “occupying, living on, or having improvements on” land within National Forests “more valuable for agricultural or grazing purposes than for timber” (36 Stat 863).
This was the law as it existed in 1912 when Congress amended the 1880 Act For Relief of Settlers (37 Stat. 267) and recognized a “preference right” of settlers to an ”additional entry” under the “enlarged homestead provisions” of the Desert Land Laws to claim an amount of land to the extent of their occupancy and possession as long as their boundaries were plainly marked.
In1916 (after 17 years of debate) Congress finally passed the only homestead Act specific to livestock production, the Stock Raising Homestead Act. The intent of the SRHA was to make a permanent disposal of all the remaining approximately 600 million acres in the West “chiefly valuable for grazing and raising forage crops”.(Stock-Raising Homesteads, 1916. House Rep. No.35. 64Th Cong., 1st Sess.) Section 10 of the SRHA provided for the withdrawal of 600 million acres under the 1910, Pickett Act for “classification” so the range could be surveyed, and allotted as “additional entries” under Section 8. Where an entryman had paid the required fees, made the required improvement and cultivation, and the size of the unit was determined and the plat returned, the entryman had done all required and the equitable title was vested in the entryman (Irwin v. Wright, 258 US 215 (1922)).
By an Act for the Relief of Settlers of March 4, 1923 (42 Stat 1445) Congress allowed settlers under previous homestead acts to convert their “original” or base property entries to either Desert Land (Enlarged) Homestead entries or to Stock-Raising Homestead Act entries in order to change their required “proofs” to $1.25/acre “improvements”. See also the Act of June 6, 1924 amending the SRHA (43 Stat 469). Both the Desert Land (Enlarged) Homestead Acts and the Stock-Raising Homestead Act also allowed “preferential” or “preference” right “additional entries” to the extent of the settler’s actual possession (where his boundaries were clearly marked), of an amount of land “sufficient for the support of a family”
The Pickett Act in conformance with Section 10 of the SRHA provided authority for the creation of grazing Districts outside of National Forests, and the President began creating Grazing Districts in 1928. The Taylor Grazing Act provided for administration of Grazing Districts and provided a formalized process for establishing them. The TGA did not affect valid existing rights, and allowed for ranchers to complete their improvement requirements under section 8 of the SRHA.
This classification, adjudication and surveying was accomplished between 1916 and 1950. The SRHA Act was the grant from Congress, the survey of the ranges into allotments the recording of the maps, improvement of the additional entry to an amount equal to $1.25 per acre, and return of the maps to the ranchers in possession was all that was required by the statute, (see Sellas v Kirk, 200F.2d 217 cert. Denied 345 US 940 (1953). See also Shaw v Kellogg, 170 US 312 (1898).
Some bureaucrats would have people believe that somehow the Federal Land Management and Policy Act (FLPMA) of 1976 somehow changed 130 years of Congressional grants and property rights. FLPMA itself contains 2 pages of “savings provisions” intended to “grandfather” in place all prior existing rights. FLPMA specifically states “All actions by the Secretary [of Interior] concerned under this Act are subject to valid existing rights”. If it was true that FLPMA was intended to extinguish all of ranchers (and anyone else’s) property rights, then Congress the next year would not have provided for the protection of ranchers’ property rights under the Surface Mining Reclamation Act of 1977. (91 Stat. 524, Sec. 714, 715 and 717).
An example of prior existing rights is the Malhuer National Wildlife Refuge. In 1908 President Roosevelt, established by presidential proclamation a Bird Reserve (subject to prior existing rights). Thirty four years later the Ninth Circuit Court ruled in United States v. Otley, 127 F2d 988 (1942), that not only did the prior existing ranchers living adjacent to Malhuer Lake have the absolute right to graze and cut hay within the reserve, but actually owned half of Malhuer Lake itself. In 1942 the government paid for the right to construct roads, phonelines, plant trees, build fire towers, and build water control dams and structures. For the next thirty years these ranchers continued to graze cattle and cut hay. This all changed with a change in management at the Reserve/Refuge in the 1970’s. I’m curious as to exactly what was in the original 1942 purchase agreements. What rights were reserved in those agreements? Why is this new generation of Feds trying to force out the Hammonds by ignoring 18 USC 1857 that exempts “allotment owners” from the criminal arson provisions? The biggest question I have is why do the people of Harney County believe anything the Federal employees tell them when there is a proven history of them lying to ranchers about prior existing rights (U.S. v Otley, 1942)?
Here is the 2nd. Yes just make sure you give Dr Angus McIntosh credit for these “These three statutes make it clear that the intent of Congress was that no state would lose its jurisdiction over any land included within a Forest Reserve, Grazing District (BLM), or a Land Utilization/Resettlement Project (National Grasslands) nor any citizen lose any of their State recognized rights (such as water rights or range rights). The comments about “offenses against the United states” refers to “subject matter” jurisdiction (i.e. counterfeiting, etc.). Also, while the Forest Act says the Secretary can make rules and regulations, it also says”Nothing herein shall be construed as prohibiting the egress or ingress of actual settlers…etc. or crossing the same to and from their property or homes; and such wagon roads and other improvements may be constructed thereon as may be necessary to reach there homes and to utilize their property under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed…” Also the reserves are open to settlement and appropriation of water rights. Bureaucrats make a big deal out of the allowance for the Secretary to make rules and regulations, but the Supreme Court said the authority to make rules and regulations does not allow the Secretary to prohibit or restrict the very thing authorized by an Act of Congress (United States v. United Verde Copper Company, 196 US 207 (1905)). 30 Stat 36 (Forest Reserves) 48 Stat 1269-1270 (Grazing Districts) 49 Stat 2035-2036 (Resettlement/Utilization Projects aka National Grasslands)”
Another interesting fact Angus has brought to our attention!! “OK folks listen up. The Antiquities Act of 1906 is the authority that Obama, Clinton etc have used to designate millions of acres of parks and monuments. But, guess what? First the Act states it must be some kind of artifact or oddity,something identifiable (not thousands of acres of land), next it is confined to the smallest legal subdivision necessary of the land survey system (40 acres), finally if there are any private lands or even unperfected claims the owner must sign a “relinquishment” before it can become effective. Allotments are property rights, so unless the rancher signs a relinquishment of his rights the monument designation is totally ineffective.”
APPEARANCE AND BRIEF OF APPELLEES AND CROSS APPELLANTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDER AND DIRECTION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT https://law.resource.org/…/…/gov.uscourts.ca9.09696.b.03.pdf
COURT QUESTIONS ITS OWN JURISDICTION!:https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-otley-2
We thank all the men and women who are seeking truth to bring real justice to America. We need to free the POW’s held who are Whistle Blowers who love America, God and their families enough to take a stand for Freedom! FREE THE POLITICAL PRISONERS HELD AS POW’s!
TR/Thom & Rene’
email any news tips to: tr_thecowboyandthelady@yahoo.com
follow the Cowboy and the Lady: Twitter: https://twitter.com/trthecowboyand1 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThomRene2016/
YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH: https://www.facebook.com/notes/the-…

Like

 

Like

 

Love

 

Haha

 

Wow

 

Sad

 

Angry

Comment

22 comments
Comments
Gloria Keys
Remove

Gloria Keys Very well done!

 

Bill DiGirolamo
Remove

Bill DiGirolamo smile emoticon , Rene.

 

Patsy Weick
Remove

Patsy Weick Very well done. Now send our Ranchers Home, Hammond Men, Yes even the Bundy Men, & all others.

 

The Cowboy and the Lady
Remove

The Cowboy and the Lady And still we here crickets. Something is not right with this picture as there is too much evidence to their innocence. The facts prove innocence so why is any case still proceeding without any filings to vacate on these facts?

 

Diane Kimmel
Remove

Diane Kimmel They are moving these cases forward under maritime law which is not acceptable by Americans. Another words, we’re all under martial law and no one seems to be noting this. The system is corrupt, lawyers are held fast to the bar association which is from Britain and they do what they can while trying to hold onto their licenses to practice. I’ve read also about some of these cases of law and did tag Arnold Law in them. I’m praying Mike got them and it wasn’t overlooked. The only way we’re getting these patriots out is fir Americans to rise together and start putting the establishment and cronies back into their rightful corner of the nation. Until Americans can get past the me-me mentality, put aside our cultural or gender beliefs to stand united, this will continue. I’ve been screaming that Americans need to unite, tagging all groups I can think of. I did note today that alot are awakening. We had over 21,000 hits on a post in 24 hrs and it’s still climbing! Folks are starting to listen. We must continue to put out the correct, soul grabbing, horrific incidences our gov has done to others and shortly we will be standing united as a force to be reckoned with. The gov fears us all and that’s why they are not setting bail. They believe they’ve shut down the patriots voices but they are so wrong. They need to remember what the Japanese said when they tried to invade Alaska. For every 10 blades of grass, there is one shooter behind them. They knew they were beat. Our gov knows this also but the elitists keep pushing back with paying paid protestors to keep us distracted. That is where we need to focus right now. Most will step away from this paid shill crap once they understand that they’re dispensible too. This is not hard to accomplish if enough patriots work together across our nation. #standupamerica #PATRIOTS #LibertyRising #StopLandGrabs #savetherepublic #americansunited #GODINAMERICA

 

Joanna Blitt
Remove

Joanna Blitt Well done, great info.

 

Floyd Breshears
Remove

Floyd Breshears wow what a read, I read it and grasp most but there is so much in your post Rene ,It will take some studying, I don’t know what to think about the guy who was arrested except more lawless enforcement of someone’s will, not the law of the land, this imprison of patriots has got to be stopped , they sleep at nights in their own beds have family’s and stuff , they are just as venerable as we are do they want total war , they will loose

 

Cindy Wisner
Write a comment…
Loading…

 

 

<meta http-equiv=”refresh” content=”0; URL=/marvin.choate/posts/1066571613365458?_fb_noscript=1″ />(3) Jeff Hulvey<meta http-equiv=”X-Frame-Options” content=”DENY” />

The Federal Government was to dispose of the lands to the people. This fight with the Bureau’s has been going on for way to long. The Bureau’s are unelected individuals with a perverted lust for power, who for which there are no checks and balances on their conduct. How many lives must be destroyed before the people of this nation decide this long train of abuses have gone to far? It is safe to say the victims of these bureau’s have suffered absolute despotism! It has become necessary for the people to dissolve the political bands which enslave us. This will not be easily solved legislatively as this video shows.

Steven Millet eloquently stated how we live in a world that fosters and supports the practices of bureau’s. It is difficult to give it up unless the community gets behind it. This is due to the economic conditions it’s practices created for everyone. This is not an excuse for its existence but a manifest problem with getting rid of it. Sometimes people of a society dislike or hate practices that go on but it is hard to be rid of them because like them or not, they have a basis in society that feeds or profits from its existence. It requires great courage, sacrifice and moral fortitude on the part of most or all to completely eliminate it.

Our husband and Father, LaVoy Finicum, the Bundy’s and Adrian Sewell are but a few that had this courage and moral fortitude to no longer perpetuate the oppression of these bureau’s. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered. Where is our community of God fearing, courageous individuals who will sacrifice with moral fortitude?

See More

2014 Story of Sheriff Tony Demeo & Wayne Hage Jr & Bureau of Land Management corruption! They WON back their rights but still have not had their permits…
youtube.com

Like

 

Like

 

Love

 

Haha

 

Wow

 

Sad

 

Angry

Comment

Comments
Cindy Wisner
­

TWO CIA AGENTS ARRESTED BY MINUTEMEN WHILE CROSSING MEXICAN BORDER WITH OVER 1300 POUNDS OF COCAINE – Secrets of the Fed

WHILE CROSSING MEXICAN BORDER WITH OVER 1300 POUNDS OF COCAINE

TWO CIA AGENTS ARRESTED BY MINUTEMEN WHILE CROSSING MEXICAN BORDER WITH OVER 1300 POUNDS OF COCAINE

TWO CIA AGENTS ARRESTED BY MINUTEMEN WHILE CROSSING MEXICAN BORDER WITH OVER 1300 POUNDS OF COCAINE
­

TWO CIA AGENTS ARRESTED BY MINUTEMEN WHILE CROSSING MEXICAN BORDER WITH OVER 1300 POUNDS OF COCAINE – Secrets of the Fed

VIA – El Paso| A group of minutemen watching the Mexican Border for illegal migrants and drug traffickers, have proceeded to the citizen arrest of two men in an SUV, carrying 1300 pounds of cocaine. The volunteers were completely astonished when the two arrestees pulled out CIA ID cards and explained they were actually carrying the drug as part of their duties and that the cargo belonged to the Central Intelligence Agency.

The incident took place last night, in the Chihuahuan desert, near the Texan city of El Paso. A group of seven minutemen saw a large black SUV drive rapidly across the border. They chased the vehicle in their own trucks and achieved to immobilize it after a chase of more than 15 miles.

­

TWO CIA AGENTS ARRESTED BY MINUTEMEN WHILE CROSSING MEXICAN BORDER WITH OVER 1300 POUNDS OF COCAINE – Secrets of the Fed

The vigilantes arrested the two men on board and called the border patrol, who proceeded to search the vehicle. They discovered dozens of packages of cocaine, totaling an incredible 618.4 kilograms (1363 pounds).

minutemen2

The search of the vehicle revealed 360 packages of cocaine, all marked with the symbol of the Sinaloa Cartel, representing a black scorpion.

The two men claim to be CIA operatives based in Mexico and explained that the drug was actually part of an operation of the agency. They presented identity cards that seem to validate their claim, but the CIA spokesperson, Dean Boyd, has officially denied any link between the organization and the two men.

“The CIA doesn’t take part in drug smuggling operations at the US-Mexican border”said M. Boyd. “I do not know, for now, if the men are actually affiliated to the agency in any way, but I can tell you the cocaine doesn’t belong to the CIA.”

Both the border patrol officers and minutemen seem unconvinced, however, and many of them seem to believe that the secret service agency is hiding something. The U.S. custom services have even announced a thorough investigation to try and verify the two men’s story.

“Both of them had valid Accreditation and a receipt for their cargo” says Shawn Francis Miller, spokesman of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the El Paso sector.“What drug dealer in his right mind, demands a receipt for 1300 pounds of cocaine? There is really something strange about these guys, and we believe the CIA possibly knows more than what it is ready to admit.” 

The custom services have confirmed that the two men, who can’t be identified due to the Intelligence Identities and Protection Act of 1982, did carry valid CIA identifications and that the vehicle was indeed registered as a service vehicle of the organization.

­

TWO CIA AGENTS ARRESTED BY MINUTEMEN WHILE CROSSING MEXICAN BORDER WITH OVER 1300 POUNDS OF COCAINE – Secrets of the Fed

The two men remain under the custody of the custom services at the moment, and are still being interrogated in a facility near El Paso. They are facing charges of possessing, trafficking and importing illegal drugs, and could face other criminal charges once the investigation is over.

Both the FBI and the DEA have announced that they would collaborate with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection on this case, which as already attracted a lot of attention in Southern Texas.

<meta http-equiv=”refresh” content=”0; URL=/plugins/feedback.php?api_key&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter.php%3Fversion%3D42%23cb%3Df275ddcf32b6488%26domain%3Dwww.secretsofthefed.com%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.secretsofthefed.com%252Ff278c3d3ec75c68%26relation%3Dparent.parent&colorscheme=light&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.secretsofthefed.com%2Ftwo-cia-agents-arrested-by-minutemen-while-crossing-mexican-border-with-over-1300-pounds-of-cocaine%2F&locale=en_US&numposts=10&sdk=joey&skin=light&version=v2.0&width=600&_fb_noscript=1″ />Facebook

David Gutierrez ·

THATS HOW 99% OF THE DRUGS GET HERE.

Tommy Brown ·

Yeah yeah yeah just more lies that Obam’s admistration is telling us. All I can is this: It’s time for all who voted for Obama now speak up or forever hold your peace as this new civil war is about to explode here in our country over you. Yes I said YOU the voters who voted for this illegal President.

Shelley Hanson Griffiths ·

BS! If you work for the CIA you carry no identification saying you do. Especially if your under cover and working withbdrugs. total BS

Brent Roads

Follow the money! Far more people are benefiting from the drug trade from Mexico than the Cartels. My guess is political party’s,politicians and race baiters are making a bundle on drugs and that is why we have open borders–no other reason!

William Frail ·

Excellent point !
Like · Reply · 14 · Aug 4, 2015 10:21am

Jim Hall ·

ITS called the retirement fund for Politicians and their Friends.
Like · Reply · 3 · Aug 4, 2015 10:57pm

James Roberts ·

Whether they are are or not cia. It doesn’t matter. Becasue alot of Cocaine isn’t going to make it to the streets. No matter who’s it is, its proof drugs are flowing over the borders which Obama refuses to beef up. He’s busy with Muslim Brotherhood,lions,flags and taking multi million dollar vacations.

William Russ ·

They are part of Obamas plan to dope all people in office look at Peloise and others.

Steven Williams ·

With the economy in the toilet, the C.I.A. makes money how ever they can.

William Sheaffer

somethings stinks about this big time!!!!!!

Luther Henry

Another “Fast and Furious” operation by the governement, this time by the CIA which again was blundered and now they will deny, deny and deny. Good work by the Minute Men and the cooperation of the Border Patrol. Let Obama take credit for this boondoggel also. This more than likely has something to do with the open border policy and the flood of illegal aliens into the democrat ranks. I hope Trey Gowdy gets to sink his teeth into it.

Jack Roth ·

Looks like we need to start protecting ourselves against our own Goverment.

Doug Griffiths

Looks like another fast & frurous cas to me only this time they got caught before the bad guys got the goods. Another obama screwup.

Junie High

You know Brent , I think you are on to something.. It has been said that Obama does like the cocaine..

Jerry Harvison ·

Payment for fast and furious guns.From the cartel to the black muslims.

Matthew Peters ·

Who else has the logistic capability to provide the tons of illegal drugs that our country uses daily ?

Mark Martin

YOU ARE ALL WRONG. ITS FOR O-BUMMERS GETTING OUT OF OFFICE PARTY.

Denny Bayer

I do believe the CIA was transporting the same drug during the Viet Nam war, conveing it in casgets, the same casgets our KIA were being brought home in!!…

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s