The Unbelievable Bathroom Sign Spotted At DNC Has Backfired On The Dems BIG Time | EndingFed News Network
This is too good: The virtue-signaling Democrat Party “coincidentally” placed their “all-gender restroom” directly across from the press booth. Oh, and it isn’t even an “all-gender” restroom, it’s a women’s restroom with an “all-gender” sign, according to radio host Jason Rantz.
Recently, Democrats have pushed their campaign for so-called transgender bathroom rights–the “right” for men who merely claim to be women the use of female locker-rooms and bathrooms–as a “civil rights” issue. This is, of course, a hard slap in the face to those who actually suffered through a suppression of their civil rights, but nonetheless, this is the left’s narrative.
Furthering their narrative while simultaneously painting Republicans as bigots, as usual, the Democrats strategically placed their “all-gender” bathroom sign in front of the press booth.
“All of the other bathrooms in the arena appear to be more traditional, split by the sexes. Is it a coincidence that the all-gender restroom is right by the press booth?” asks Rantz.
Still, the press bit, of course.
The radio host explained that he when he entered the “all-gender restroom” to take photos, all he found was a women’s restroom: “It appears that it’s just a women’s bathroom with the new sign on it,” he stated.
What are the odds?
“All of the other bathrooms in the arena appear to be more traditional, split by the sexes. Is it a coincidence that the all-gender restroom is right by the press booth?”
Other reports have claimed that there are more “all-gender restrooms” on site, but they are likely just women’s rooms with a new sign, too. Check out the photo below, for instance: The sign reads “all-gender” while another sign directly below it says “women.” This is odd, to say the least.
Democrats, who are typically pros when it comes to phony pandering, have really slipped this election cycle. Just ask the “Hispandering” “Abuela” Hillary Clinton.
When I was in the third grade, I raised my hand one day and asked the teacher for permission to “go to the bathroom.” She nodded, and I hurried down the hall to the door designated “Boys.” When I had relieved myself, I headed back in the direction of my homeroom. As bad luck would have it, the doors in the hallway all looked alike, and I opened the wrong one. Two second-grade girls were standing there with their mouths open in disbelief. Then they both screamed and pointed at me. The loudest one said, “You’re in BIG trouble!” The other shouted, “Get out of here!” Sweet kids.
I was mortified beyond belief. I sneaked back into class and looked at the floor, wondering who might have witnessed my unthinkable crime. That was decades ago, but I haven’t forgotten my humiliation. The cardinal rule is that boys and girls never entered each other’s private facilities. Never!
How the world has changed! Who would have believed a day would come during my lifetime when boys could meander into the private sanctuary of girls’ toilets, or that it would someday be a civil right for men to use women’s locker rooms and showers without permission or apology? Imagine sex-absorbed junior high boys ogling the bodies of developing pubescent girls or standing beside them in their showers. Have we gone absolutely mad? What ever happened to modesty, safety, and Christian mores?
Did it upset you when the president of the United States ordered every public school in America to open all its bathroom facilities including those that are in use by a member of the opposite sex? The president’s order made me furious, and then sick to my stomach. How dare this man do something so audacious and unthinkable! His letter from the White House carried an implied threat to withhold federal money from local schools, which rocked the halls of public education. Who is this politician that is spending your hard-earned tax dollars to manipulate school officials, anyway? Who is it that is warping our children? It is Barack Obama, one of the worst presidents in American history, and it is time we stood up and said so!
Obama, acting like a king, is wielding dictatorial powers never envisioned in the law. He is determined to change the way males and females relate to one another, and worse, how children perceive themselves. If you are a married man with any gumption, surely you will defend your wife’s privacy and security in restroom facilities. Would you remain passive after knowing that a strange-looking man, dressed like a woman, has been peering over toilet cubicles to watch your wife in a private moment? What should be done to the pervert who was using mirrors to watch women and girls in their stalls? If you are a dad, I pray you will protect your little girls from men who walk in unannounced, unzip their pants and urinate in front of them. If this had happened 100 years ago, someone might have been shot. Where is today’s manhood? God help us!
(You are probably aware that Target has taken a stand to allow persons who “self-identify” as a man or woman to use the restroom of their choice. In addition to Target Stores, the following retailers have also decided, against the objection of their customers, to create “gender neutral” bathrooms: Starbucks, Ross, Walgreens, Toys “R” Us, and Barnes & Noble. My wife, Shirley, and I will no longer patronize these stores, and I hope millions of others will do likewise.)
Let’s talk more about Barack Obama, who is a tyrant in many ways. How dare he assault centuries of modesty and moral beliefs! By what authority does he tell parents and school officials what to teach children under their care? Christian parents, does this outrageous order violate something deep within your sense of propriety? The president has already maneuvered the courts to undermine a 5,000-year-old definition of marriage, after experiencing his infamous epiphany. Now he is determined to change Western civilization forever. He becomes more reckless and defiant as his second term comes to an end. Never has an American president been so absorbed with the use and abuse of power, and unfortunately, he still has seven months to go. What is next?
I grew up respecting the authority and dignity of the nation’s presidents. Each of them was tasked to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and to protect our rights as citizens. That is what I was taught. My fourth grade teacher, Mrs. Harris, described for us the three branches of government, and how each division has the authority to restrain the other two according to a principle known as “checks and balances.” It made America unique among nations. But, with the complete refusal of the U.S. Congress to restrain the presidency or to curtail a runaway judiciary that is itself drunk with power, “we the people” are victimized by those who steal our freedom. Our Founding Fathers would be shocked to learn how the safeguards on our freedom have been abandoned.
My friend Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council recently said he is often asked, “Why is the Obama administration trying to mainstream ‘transgenderism’ and force schools to accommodate students who want to use the bathrooms and locker rooms of the opposite sex?” Tony’s answer gets to the heart of the motive: “It’s all part of a radical movement trying to destroy the fact that God created man and woman – and that somehow people can choose what gender they want to be. The ultimate goal is to break down all sexual inhibition and morality – a goal that would result in social chaos.”
This is what influential feminist Dale O’Leary had to say on the issue of gender and its meaning in her publication, “Gender: The Deconstruction of Women: Analysis of the Gender Perspective in Preparation for the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China.” She wrote, “Although many people think that men and women are the natural expression of a genetic blueprint, gender is a product of human thought and culture, a social construction that creates the ‘true nature’ of all individuals.”
Do you understand what she was saying? Gender is not determined by your chromosomes. It is a product of culture. If a man thinks like a woman, he IS a woman. Furthermore, if we protect children from social and religious conditioning, people will be free to move into and out of existing gender roles at will. Taking that concept to its logical conclusion, the feminists and LGBT activists want to dissolve the traditional roles of mothers and fathers and, in time, eliminate references to wife, husband, son, daughter, sister, brother, manhood, womanhood, boy, girl, masculine and feminine. These activists want us to replace age-old terminology with neutral terms, such as significant other, spouse, parent, child and sibling. You’ll see that happening in the near future. The bottom line is that they want to destroy human sexuality and take with it the foundation of the family. That is their goal, and they have a president in office who is willing to use his executive authority to force this nonsense on us all.
Clearly, there are serious implications here for mothers and fathers. I urge you to protect your boys and girls from those who are espousing these views. Shield them from gender feminism and from those who would confuse their sexuality. They will be under increasing political pressure in years to come.
It is also important for us as adults to understand our own sexual identities. If we don’t know who we are, our kids will be doubly confused about who they are. Any uncertainty, any ambiguity in that assignment must be seen as damaging not only to our sons and daughters but also to the long-term stability of society itself.
I urge you to base your teachings about sexuality on the Scriptures, which tell us, “God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them” (Genesis 1:27). Jesus, who was the first Jewish leader to give dignity and status to women, said, “Haven’t you read … that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’” and, “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh” (Matthew 19:4-5). That is the divine plan. It leaves no doubt that the Creator made not one sex but two, each beautifully crafted to “fit with” and meet the needs of the other. Any effort to teach children differently is certain to produce turmoil in the soul of a child.
We must fight to protect our homes and families from politically correct politicians who would create new entitlements that take away our liberties. There is no time to lose. Our children hang in the balance.
<meta http-equiv=”refresh” content=”0; URL=/?_fb_noscript=1″ />Cindy Wisner<meta http-equiv=”X-Frame-Options” content=”DENY” />
Flyover CultureLike Page
While the world burns, what is the issue galvanizing the American left? #Priorities
***UPDATE*** Attention, leftist trolls:
In language you can understand,… your “microaggressions” against our “safe spaces” will result in prompt deletion and banning. Honest, respectful debate is welcome, but hysterical posters who insult others, fail to grasp the larger point and take everything literally need to find another place for their screeching. Capiche?
<meta http-equiv=”refresh” content=”0; URL=/?_fb_noscript=1″ />(5) Outlaw Morgan<meta http-equiv=”X-Frame-Options” content=”DENY” />
Outlaw Morgan The time is now. Fight back. Or the bully will only grow stronger. Rise up people! https://www.facebook.com/LoriFullbrightNewsOn6/posts/1126259057425076
We just received this letter from the OK AG… he tells the feds their new bathroom guidelines for schools are against the law:
Dear Assistant Secretary Lhamon …and Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta,
We have reviewed the “significant guidance letter” issued today. Despite contending that it “does not add requirements to applicable law,” this letter most definitely changes the law in that it takes the unprecedented step of redefining “sex” to mean “gender identity.” Your citations to U.S. Supreme Court precedent and references to lower court cases and administrative action are disingenuous at best.
Further, you have forced this definition on parents, students, and communities because you have deemed unjustifiable any discomfort that they may express. Your determination thus elevates the status of transgender students over those who would define their sex based on biology and who would seek to have their definition honored in the most private of places. Indeed, those latter students and their families cannot even seek reassurance that a transgender student’s self-definition is not premised on whim or caprice because you have disavowed the school’s ability to seek any form of documentation regarding the transgender child’s self-definition.
Not only does this “significant guidance letter” attempt to redefine for all Americans their most fundamental beliefs about who they are, it compels schools to join with you in enforcing this
new definition. By conditioning the receipt of federal funds on compliance with the “significant guidance letter,” schools have been given an ultimatum: take it or lose it. As you must know, this leaves many schools without any real choice. You have thus transformed the federal “carrot and stick” approach to school funding into “all stick.”
We believe that your actions today are unlawful and that they represent the most egregious administrative overreach to date. You have taken a public policy issue that must, by our constitutional design, be worked out in the laboratory of democracy and enforced it on all people. And you have done so through a misuse of the spending power.
Please be advised that if you attempt to enforce this “significant guidance letter” on schools in the State of Oklahoma, we will vigorously defend the State’s interests.
E. SCOTT PRUITT
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
Folks there is NO SUCH THING as a “Transgender Woman” or a “Transgender Man”. You’re born a woman or a man and that’s what you’ll always be. — Defend the liberty of all, hate not, but STOP letting people steal words in an attempt to make bad behavior normal and forced upon us.
Joshua Krystyniak Gavin I support most things you say. But 1 out off 100,000 babies are in fact born with both sexual organs. That’s a medical fact. That being said this bathroom issue makes me irate. Mostly Obamas recent letter threatening to take away free meals if our schools do not conform. I don’t understand why they can’t just make ” family restrooms” like most places have. Meant for one person at a time and be done with it.
Joshua Krystyniak Chuck Ladwig It is also great for parents with opposite sexed little ones. Or elder people who need assistance. Keep the men’s women’s and add a single one. If your uncomfortable deciding which one to use, then go into single one. No pressure and everyone is comfortable. If it was up to me I could care less who is in the bathroom with me.What scares me is the little ones. For this view I’ve been called homophobic and all sorts of names. It’s not my job to judge that’s for my God. I just want our youngins to be safe.
<meta http-equiv=”refresh” content=”0; URL=/?_fb_noscript=1″ />(8) Facebook<meta http-equiv=”X-Frame-Options” content=”DENY” />
Dan ForestLike Page
Lieutenant Governor Dan Forest released the following statement in response to President Obama’s bathroom policy directive:
“North Carolina will not stand by an…d let our locker rooms and high school showers be used for social experimentation at the expense of the privacy and protection of our young boys and girls. I do not think it is appropriate for teenage boys and girls to share the same bathroom. I don’t think it appropriate for teenage boys and girls to shower next to each other. I don’t think it is appropriate for male coaches and male teachers to have access to girls’ locker rooms and showers while the young girls are naked and exposed. I feel confident, the vast majority of North Carolina parents feel the same.
The President needs a reminder that the United States Constitution grants education decision authority to the states and localities not to the President of the United States. Our current state policy protects our children by maintaining bathrooms and restrooms consistent with the biological sex of the child and already gives schools, should special circumstances arise, the freedom to grant private single stall – single shower bathroom accommodations to individuals who might not otherwise be comfortable using the bathroom of their biological sex or a bathroom shared with other people. This is the only reasonable response to the situation that exists today. Opening all showers and all restrooms to all sexes at all times as the President is suggesting, is not a reasonable solution, but an invitation for violations of privacy and personal safety.
North Carolina public schools in receipt of the President’s letter are reminded that there is a binding state law on the books governing bathroom policy and the President’s non-binding directive is merely his attempt to push his version of a social policy on our state with no Constitutional authority to do so. It should be rejected as a matter of principle and policy.”